Today's hottest deals
AMD100-000001084
AMDFD4300WMHKBOX

8 Cores, 16 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2024.

4 Cores, 4 Threads @3.8GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 55,565 user samples
111 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 135% Base clock 4.9 GHz, turbo 5.55 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 113% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Poor: 113% Great: 135%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
55,454 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 60% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 36% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 36% Great: 60%
SPEED RANK: 770th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
122 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+137%
51.6 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
91.6 Pts Lower memory latency.
+19%
77.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
221 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+286%
57.2 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
431 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+323%
102 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
818 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+435%
153 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1,506 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+835%
161 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
98.7 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
89.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
232 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+234%
69.5 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
460 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+262%
127 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
919 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+360%
200 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1,816 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+808%
200 Pts
Market Share
Based on 69,052,293 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.09 % Hugely higher market share.
+800%
0.01 %
Value
Value For Money
111 % Much better value.
+49%
74.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
57 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
54 %
Price
Price (score)
$399 $73 Hugely cheaper.
+82%
Age
Newest
0+ Months Hugely more recent.
+100%
145 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2,418 Pts Insanely faster OC 64-core speed.
+1,109%
200 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2,242 Pts Insanely faster 64-core speed.
+1,284%
162 Pts

AMD’s 7800X3D and 9800X3D CPUs, priced over $400 USD, are widely marketed as “the best gaming CPUs in the world”. This is demonstrated at low resolutions with a 4090-class GPU, whilst conveniently ignoring 0.1% lows (frame drops). Under cherry-picked cache-bound conditions the X3D chips do excel, but there’s a trade-off: the additional cache results in 6% lower boost clocks and 50% to 80% higher prices than their regular counterparts (9700X and 7700X). As with their Radeon GPUs, AMD is looking to drive demand through advanced marketing rather than delivering real-world performance. While Nvidia has effectively countered AMD’s marketing in the GPU space, Intel's marketers remain asleep (terminally?) at the wheel. Nevertheless, the 13600K and 14600K still deliver almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more on a gaming CPU is often pointless, as games are normally limited by the GPU. Without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). Since this summary was published just two days ago, hundreds of twitter threads, thousands of “pcmasterrace” reddit posts, multiple magazine articles, and several youtube videos have emerged in unanimous support for the $480 USD 9800X3D. All of these supposedly disinterested actors are working the weekend to convince you to pay their favourite billion-dollar brand an extra $280 USD this holiday season. [Nov '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD FX-4300 is a budget quad-core processor which unlike its predecessor, the Bulldozer FX-4100, is based on the Piledriver micro-architecture which was released in Q4 of 2012. Its base clock speed of 3.8 GHz boosts to 4.0 GHz in turbo mode and with appropriate cooling can be overclocked to speeds of over 4.5 GHz. Even though these numbers are impressive, the real world effective speed is only 66. This is ok for general computing and even gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. The user experience will, however, be noticeably snappier with a CPU that has better single-core performance. Whilst the FX-4300 is cheap, it’s not so differently priced from the hexa core FX-6300 which offers significantly improved multi-core performance. [Nov '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback