COMPARE
The Best CPUs
USER RATINGS - VALUE FOR MONEY - REAL WORLD SPEED
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100001084WOF
AMD100-100001404WOF
▲ 582,673 ▼

8 Cores, 8 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2024.

VS
▲ 59473 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen5.
Release date: Q3 2024.

Effective Speed 
+5%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 3,122 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
2,321 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 134% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 112% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 112% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 1407
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
801 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 130% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 5.55 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 96% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 96% Great: 130%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 1407
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		122 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+5% 		116 %
Average Score 
+3%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		89.9 Pts Lower memory latency.
+15% 		78.5 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		218 Pts 222 Pts +2%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		430 Pts 437 Pts +2%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		828 Pts +0% 824 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1,541 Pts +5% 1,469 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+1%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		99 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11% 		89.5 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		229 Pts 236 Pts +3%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		459 Pts 470 Pts +2%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		910 Pts 931 Pts +2%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1,777 Pts +0% 1,774 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+88%
Market Share
Based on 70,572,307 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.9 % Hugely higher market share.
+400% 		0.18 %
Value
Value For Money 		103 % 111 % Slightly better value.
+8%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		58 % 59 % +2%
Price
Price (score) 		€469 €297 Much cheaper.
+37%
Nice To Haves 
+9%
Age
Newest 		8+ Months More recent.
+20% 		10 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		2,391 Pts 2,407 Pts +1%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		2,170 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+8% 		2,014 Pts
Conclusion 
Average Bench 122%
Average Bench 116%

AMD’s 7800X3D and 9800X3D CPUs, priced over $400 USD, are widely marketed as “the best gaming CPUs in the world”. This is demonstrated at low resolutions with a 4090-class GPU, whilst conveniently ignoring 0.1% lows (frame drops). Under cherry-picked cache-bound conditions the X3D chips do excel, but there’s a trade-off: the additional cache results in 6% lower boost clocks and 50% to 80% higher prices than their regular counterparts (9700X and 7700X). As with their Radeon GPUs, AMD is looking to drive demand through advanced marketing rather than delivering real-world performance. While Nvidia has effectively countered AMD’s marketing in the GPU space, Intel's marketers remain asleep (terminally?) at the wheel. Nevertheless, the 13600K and 14600K still deliver almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more on a gaming CPU is often pointless, as games are normally limited by the GPU. Without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). Since this summary was published just two days ago, hundreds of twitter threads, thousands of “pcmasterrace” reddit posts, multiple magazine articles, and several youtube videos have emerged in unanimous support for the $480 USD 9800X3D. All of these supposedly disinterested actors are working the weekend to convince you to pay their favourite billion-dollar brand an extra $280 USD this holiday season. [Nov '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9000 CPUs have the same integrated graphics, PCIe lanes, USB support and DRAM controller as the Ryzen 7000 series. The only difference is improved cores which have moved from TSMC's 5 nm process to 4 nm. The new cores offer 15% more performance under cherry-picked conditions but for latency-sensitive workloads, like gaming, they are just few percent faster. The 9600X, 9700X, 9900X, and 9950X are priced at $280, $360, $500, and $650, respectively, making them $80-$200 USD more expensive than the 7000 series. Since the 7000 series flopped (7800X3D somewhat excluded) due to unrealistic pricing, slow boot times, high platform costs and windows gamebar requirements etc., the 9000 series is more or less DOA. When the 9000X3D variants launch (expected in early 2025) gamers who play cache sensitive games such as SoTTR or Factorio with a 4090 and don’t mind frame drops, may find value in the 9800X3D. Meanwhile, Intel’s 12th and 13th gen CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. Furthermore, Intel is scheduled to launch Arrow-Lake (est. +10% performance vs 14th gen) and Lunar-Lake (snapdragon competitive x86 battery life) this year, but they face serious challenges due to reliance on marketers who are mostly funded by AMD. Even if Arrow and Lunar Lake deliver stellar performance, without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Aug '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
2,321
801
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2025 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmarks by technical masters

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation. More »
Why does UserBenchmark need so many captchas?
Our servers must handle malicious traffic because our user-focused service leads to less profit for brands. More »
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products. More »
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands. More »
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 15 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K €178Nvidia RTX 4060 €308WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB €153
Intel Core i5-14600K €212Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti €441WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB €107
Intel Core i5-12400F €108Nvidia RTX 4070 €568Crucial T700 M.2 4TB €432
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback