COMPARE
The Best CPUs
USER RATINGS - VALUE FOR MONEY - REAL WORLD SPEED
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000910WOF
AMD100-100000591WOF
VS
Effective Speed 
+5%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 19,869 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
12,613 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 122% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 110% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 110% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 34th / 1407
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
7,256 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 122% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.45 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 102% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 102% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 54th / 1407
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		117 % +5% 112 %
Average Score 
+1%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		95.6 Pts Lower memory latency.
+16% 		82.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		193 Pts 209 Pts Slightly faster single-core speed.
+8%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		383 Pts 402 Pts +5%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		743 Pts 756 Pts +2%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1,356 Pts +2% 1,331 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+5%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		98.9 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7% 		92.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		200 Pts 218 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+9%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		397 Pts 432 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+9%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		787 Pts 850 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+8%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1,527 Pts 1,615 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+6%
Value & Sentiment 
+43%
Market Share
Based on 70,572,307 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.77 % Hugely higher market share.
+175% 		0.28 %
Value
Value For Money 		105 % 110 % Slightly better value.
+5%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		95 % Much more popular.
+34% 		71 %
Price
Price (score) 		€379 €266 Cheaper.
+30%
Nice To Haves 
+2%
Age
Newest 		26+ Months More recent.
+21% 		33 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1,857 Pts 1,975 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+6%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1,742 Pts 1,895 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+9%
Conclusion 
Average Bench 117%
Average Bench 112%

The AMD 7000X3D CPUs have the same core architecture as the rest of the 7000 series but they have one group of eight "3D" cores with extra cache. The “3D” cores are priced higher but run at 10% lower clocks. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 7000X variant. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with an RTX 4090 ($2,000) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. AMD continue to develop “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers with the obvious aim of compensating for second tier products with first tier marketing. PC gamers considering a 7000X3D CPU need to work on their critical thinking skills: Influencers are paid handsomely to promote overpriced niche products (X3D, EPYC, Threadripper etc.). Rational gamers have little reason to look further than the $300 13600K which offers comparable real-world gaming and better desktop performance at a fraction of the price. Workstation users (and RTX 4080+ gamers) may find value in higher core CPUs such as the 16-core $400 13700K. Despite offering better performance at lower prices, as long as Intel continues to sample and sponsor marketers that are mostly funded by AMD, they will struggle to win market share. [Apr '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
12,613
7,256
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2025 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmarks by technical masters

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation. More »
Why does UserBenchmark need so many captchas?
Our servers must handle malicious traffic because our user-focused service leads to less profit for brands. More »
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products. More »
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands. More »
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 15 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K €178Nvidia RTX 4060 €308WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB €153
Intel Core i5-14600K €212Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti €441WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB €107
Intel Core i5-12400F €108Nvidia RTX 4070 €568Crucial T700 M.2 4TB €432
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback