TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMD FD6300WMHKBOX

FX-6300

▲ 5717,054 ▼

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.5GHz, Piledriver.
Release date: Q4 2012.

Average Bench: 61.4% (523rd of 1355)

Based on 271,127 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00600F20 Model: AMD FX(tm)-6300 Six-Core Processor

The FX 6-Core, like most CPUs from AMD, delivers reasonably good server orientated multi threaded performance and consequently good processing thoughput at a reasonable price tag. Where the FX 6-Core lacks is in the area of single core performance which although not normally a major problem for server workloads, is always very relevant to desktop users. The overall performance of the FX 6-Core is comparable to Intel's five years younger Core i7-950. There are server orientated use cases where the FX 6-Core will excel thanks to its excellent overall throughput and in those instances the FX 6-Core represents good value for money. But typical desktop users will find far better value elsewhere. [Sep '13 CPUPro]

Poor: 52%Average: 61.4% Great: 68%
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Popular builds with this CPU

Above average average bench

The AMD FX-6300 averaged 38.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 80.4Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 69Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD FX-6300 is just 16.3%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX-6300 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 320Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 316Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 271,127 samples)
Rank 52361.4%
Min Avg Max
68.3 Memory 80.4 90.5
51.8 1-Core 69 77.8
96.2 2-Core 131 150
58.4% 93.4 Pts
Min Avg Max
163 4-Core 234 269
206 8-Core 316 372
35.9% 275 Pts
Min Avg Max
224 64-Core 320 376
21.5% 320 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
67% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 68
2-Core 133
62% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 330
37% 287 Pts
64-Core 326
22% 326 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
64.5% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 138
62% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 330
38% 289 Pts
64-Core 321
22% 321 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
63.3% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 132
62% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 320
34% 268 Pts
64-Core 333
22% 333 Pts
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
63.2% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 136
61% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 327
38% 289 Pts
64-Core 326
22% 326 Pts
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
51% Above average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 84.4
40% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 287
32% 245 Pts
64-Core 285
19% 285 Pts
271,127 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 52,615,043 CPUs tested.

 Prices

MSRP ≈ $115 @ launch in Oct '12
EbayUS $807 days
BHPhotoUS $905 years
AmazonUS $1002 months
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical FX-6300 Builds (Compare 18,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P - $149

CPU
FX-6300AMD  $80Bench 61%, 271,127 samples4,945x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $155Bench 31%, 870,997 samples1,592x
RX 580AMD  $260Bench 55%, 777,544 samples1,137x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $290Bench 57%, 1,300,415 samples913x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $30Bench 66%, 390,171 samples768x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $75Bench 106%, 705,872 samples454x
A400 120GBKingston  $25Bench 60%, 161,804 samples454x
RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,853 samples776x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,376 samples486x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,529 samples362x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $414

Popular FX-6300 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

DEU-User
Avatar level
5,171

Official site www.amd.com/...

Accomplish breathtaking 3D modeling and HD video editing. ...

Added 8 years ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
8,688

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

4 days ago.

CAN-User
Avatar level
4,440

Good

5 months ago.

it can't handle vr and runs everything poorly so I don't like it

IDN-User
Avatar level
4,137

Excellent

4 months ago.

This CPU has the best longevity. Paired with 970 Extreme4 which has 4+1 vrm configuration, it still handles overclock like a champ. OC'ed mine to 4.4 Ghz @ 1.3375 V and stable like a rock. But the temp will go crazy like 64 Celcius max so I toned down to 4.2 Ghz @ 1.3250 V

AUS-User
Avatar level
3,480

Average

2 years ago.

still got mine with a strix 970, 4.1 ghz clock will do 5ghz but mobo don't like anything over 4.1(cheap) it turns off after an hour or so I need a better a one currently have a 6700k strix o8g 1080 but don't want to get rid of my amd pc. Better mobo to get the 5ghz clock oc the 970 as well should still be good for a couple of years. FX 6300 OC`s easy but so does my 6700k put it straight to 5ghz too then backed off to 4.9 till water cooling arrives so its at 4.5ghz, compared to amd its a heater but they run 70-80c normal so is ok hell mine is at 34c idle fx is way cooler and wont like operating at 70+

ESP-User
Avatar level
3,369

Excellent

13 months ago.

I have it since less tan 2 months ago, linked to a gtx 960 G1 4gb from gigabyte and a MB msi krait edition, also 16gb ram savage 2133 and i can say it is th ebest balanced gaming pc i never build for the Price. TOTALLY RECOMMENDED :D

HUN-User
Avatar level
3,025

Good

4 months ago.

its a newer cpu and it has 8 cores and athlon has only 2 :D

BGR-User
Avatar level
2,572

Excellent

2 years ago.

Not a bad cpu for low budget gaming but its really outdated...

NOR-User
Avatar level
2,044

Poor

2 months ago.

it's ok, never was any good...

CPUPro
Avatar level
1,972

Poor

8 years ago.

gvrax
Avatar level
372

Terrible

4 years ago.

low perfomance for that price

mirr123
Avatar level
34

Average

10 months ago.

Was definitely good for its time and still passable on more budget oriented systems now . For anyone wanting to build something cheap now though : an AMD 3600 is cheaper and significantly better .

Aspire_SK
Avatar level
26

Good

5 years ago.

i7 920 could beat him on stock frequencies but in price to performance it can beat some of the modern cpus.

No1Spank
Avatar level
16

Excellent

4 years ago.

From £65 new to drop in a cheap AM3+ board you can't go wrong on a budget. This does everything well for the price. If you get a quality 990FX mobo and add a decent cooler this thing will overclock like you wouldn't believe making a useful CPU still in 2017.

hkey47
Avatar level
12

Excellent

4 years ago.

using since 2012. flawless.

EverygreenMeph
Avatar level
8

Excellent

4 months ago.

carried for years, before I knew much about OC, PSU crashed before the rest of the rig. Handed on to my mother as her most powerful PC

mikmeh
Avatar level
6

Excellent

4 years ago.

Solid CPU for my plex server

Meserschmitt262
Avatar level
6

Average

3 years ago.

Runs extremely hot. This was my old CPU, before I updated to an R5 1500X. The 6 Cores don't really made themselves known, even when rendering video. It would take nearly 45 minutes to render a 20 minute video at 1080p60. My new ryzen chip cuts that in half. In all honesty, this chip is just old and tired. If you can get it for suuuuuper cheap, and are going to overclock the hell out of it, go for it. But if you're looking to build a first PC, go with an intel chip of the same year or newer, or a new ryzen chip.

Mubeen
Avatar level
4

Very good

5 years ago.

This CPU has the best performance/price ratio (12.2012-12.2016)!! I am using it since 2012, and at that time for the price of FX-6300, Intel had Pentium G2120 to offer (in Germany). Comparing with G2120, this CPU is best for general purpose multitasking as well as gaming (with overclocking). Highly recommended. However considering the recent CPUs, Pentium G4520 (with same price tag 95€) has 1.7 times better single core performance.

MrOttertoning
Avatar level
4

Good

5 months ago.

it was a good mid-tier CPU for people getting into PC's

joel643
Avatar level
2

Good

6 years ago.

Very good processor, specially due to his price.

Monovalent
Avatar level
2

Good

4 years ago.

This CPU might seem underpowered, but it's insanely easy to overclock. I personally was able to get away with a staggering 4085MHz on stock cooling, when changing the VCore to 1.3v manually. Bear in mind, the stock voltage is 1.375v, which adds heat. Not only was I able to overclock on stock cooling, I was able to enable Core Performance Boost levels 1 AND 2. Not to mention the fact that Cool 'n' Quiet is enabled, and is working fully. I see ~1500MHz values with 0.825v when sitting idle. Overclocking Results:. 0 - 4085MHz | 1.300v. 1 - 4192MHz | 1.337v. 2 - 4300MHz | 1.375v. Bus speed was increased to 215MHz. Thermals: Thermals were actually very nice despite the fact that is on stock cooling. Under full Level 2 CPB on one core, the cpu reached roughly 59C. Under full load on all cores, reverting to base clock, the CPU reaches 64C. It's close to the Tj max, but not enough to constitute throttling. Nice job, AMD. This CPU has remained stable for almost two straight years, one of which it has spent overclocked. I'd love to see Intel CPU's attempt to keep a stable overclock with TurboBoost and SpeedStep enabled. Oh? They can't? Well, I guess I'm lucky.

ernstrom
Avatar level
2

Excellent

4 years ago.

good price and good performance, good for overclocking

Henko
Avatar level
2

Excellent

23 months ago.

O.C MY FX6300 to 4.7ghz 1.425V stable the O.C with the 6300 CPU´s is insane

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 9 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i7-12700K
vs Intel Core i5-11600K
vs Intel Core i3-12100F
vs Intel Core i5-12400
vs Intel Core i7-11700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

1355 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $278Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3050 $250Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
Intel Core i7-12700K $334Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $72SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback