IntelBX8071514600K
AMD100-100001084WOF

14 Cores, 20 Threads @3.5GHz, Raptor Lake.
Release date: Q4 2023.

8 Cores, 8 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2024.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 5,664 user samples
3,343 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 129% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 117% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 117% Great: 129%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 1407
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
2,321 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 134% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 112% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 112% Great: 134%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 1407
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 124%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
124 % +1% 122 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
83.1 Pts 89.9 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
219 Pts +0% 218 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
440 Pts +2% 430 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
877 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+6%
828 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1,526 Pts 1,541 Pts +1%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92 Pts 99 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
225 Pts 229 Pts +2%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
451 Pts 459 Pts +2%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
899 Pts 910 Pts +1%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1,588 Pts 1,777 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+12%
Market Share
Based on 70,572,307 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.45 % 0.9 % Hugely higher market share.
+100%
Value
Value For Money
129 % Better value.
+26%
103 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
97 % Much more popular.
+67%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
€212 Much cheaper.
+55%
€469
Age
Newest
20 Months 8+ Months Much more recent.
+60%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2,647 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+11%
2,391 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2,532 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+17%
2,170 Pts

Excellent value CPU, great for gaming, does everything quick fast and in a hurry. Decent headroom as well, mine matches the average bench of i7-14700k on this site (130%) with only a very minor overclock. Even the i9-14900k only averages 131%. It's hard for me to understand why users buy those two way-overpriced CPUs in lieu of this beast. I haven't even tried using higher OC settings--there's absolutely no need at this point in time. Perhaps in 5 years or so I'll revisit that statement. All things considered, the 14600k earns a strong 'recommend' after a full year of use. [Feb '25 mke1jrs]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s 7800X3D and 9800X3D CPUs, priced over $400 USD, are widely marketed as “the best gaming CPUs in the world”. This is demonstrated at low resolutions with a 4090-class GPU, whilst conveniently ignoring 0.1% lows (frame drops). Under cherry-picked cache-bound conditions the X3D chips do excel, but there’s a trade-off: the additional cache results in 6% lower boost clocks and 50% to 80% higher prices than their regular counterparts (9700X and 7700X). As with their Radeon GPUs, AMD is looking to drive demand through advanced marketing rather than delivering real-world performance. While Nvidia has effectively countered AMD’s marketing in the GPU space, Intel's marketers remain asleep (terminally?) at the wheel. Nevertheless, the 13600K and 14600K still deliver almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more on a gaming CPU is often pointless, as games are normally limited by the GPU. Without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). Since this summary was published just two days ago, hundreds of twitter threads, thousands of “pcmasterrace” reddit posts, multiple magazine articles, and several youtube videos have emerged in unanimous support for the $480 USD 9800X3D. All of these supposedly disinterested actors are working the weekend to convince you to pay their favourite billion-dollar brand an extra $280 USD this holiday season. [Nov '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2025 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmarks by technical masters

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation. More »
Why does UserBenchmark need so many captchas?
Our servers must handle malicious traffic because our user-focused service leads to less profit for brands. More »
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products. More »
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands. More »
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 15 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K €178Nvidia RTX 4060 €308WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB €153
Intel Core i5-14600K €212Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti €441WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB €107
Intel Core i5-12400F €108Nvidia RTX 4070 €568Crucial T700 M.2 4TB €432
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback