Today's hottest deals
AMD100-100000591WOF
AMD100-100000023BOX

8 Cores, 16 Threads @4.5GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

12 Cores, 24 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 200,888 user samples
3,546 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 122% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 99% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 99% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
197,342 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 168th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
112 % Faster effective speed.
+28%
87.9 %
20 Oct22|HardwareLUXX
The Dino Intel is not yet extinct:...
22 % Control 30%, SpiderM 5%, CPunk 10%, RiftB 53%, TWarTroy 26%, F122 25%, DoomE 6%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
26 % Forza5 9%, AoE4 36%, Bord3 40%, FarC6 33%, WatchDL 8%, BFV 40%, CPunk 4%, EldenR 22%, RDR2 0%, Civ6 38%, CSGO 80%, DoomE 1%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...
14 % FarC6 28%, RDR2 6%, MetroEx 8%, TWarW3 27% F122 0%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79.8 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
75 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
205 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+47%
139 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
404 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+47%
275 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
775 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+44%
539 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1383 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+34%
1030 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.3 Pts +4% 87.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
217 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+47%
148 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
434 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+47%
295 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
847 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+47%
577 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1648 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+46%
1128 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,721,259 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.23 % 0.24 % +4%
Value
Value For Money
115 % Much better value.
+37%
83.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
71 % 73 % +3%
Price
Price (score)
$260 Cheaper.
+22%
$335
Age
Newest
24 Months Much more recent.
+61%
62 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 12 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 24 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
5 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.5 GHz Faster base frequency.
+18%
3.8 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+17%
4.6 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2025 Pts 2224 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+10%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1890 Pts 2036 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+8%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen4 Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM5 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
RDNA2 None

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback