COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000591WOF
AMD100-100000022BOX
▲ 711,754 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @4.5GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

VS
▲ 704,219 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

Effective Speed 
+34%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 298,505 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
3,546 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 122% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 99% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 99% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
294,959 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 74% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 74% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 208th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		112 % Much faster effective speed.
+34% 		84.1 %
External Data: 1080p 
+30%
20 Oct22|HardwareLUXX
The Dino Intel is not yet extinct:... 		29 % Control 23%, SpiderM 7%, CPunk 8%, RiftB 72%, TWarTroy 42%, F122 36%, DoomE 12%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best... 		31 % Forza5 12%, AoE4 34%, Bord3 38%, FarC6 36%, WatchDL 10%, BFV 44%, CPunk 5%, EldenR 16%, RDR2 0%, Civ6 89%, CSGO 85%, DoomE 5%
Average Score 
+47%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		79.8 Pts +4% 76.9 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		205 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+51% 		136 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		404 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+53% 		264 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		775 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+58% 		490 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1383 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+71% 		808 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+49%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.3 Pts +5% 87.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		217 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+49% 		146 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		434 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+51% 		287 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		847 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+53% 		553 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1648 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+88% 		878 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+5%
Market Share
Based on 68,721,775 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.23 % 0.27 % Higher market share.
+17%
Value
Value For Money 		115 % Better value.
+23% 		93.3 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		71 % +1% 70 %
Price
Price (score) 		$260 $190 Cheaper.
+27%
Nice To Haves 
+40%
Age
Newest 		24 Months Much more recent.
+61% 		62 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		105 Watts 95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		8 cores Much higher core count.
+33% 		6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33% 		12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		5 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29% 		7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		4.5 GHz Faster base frequency.
+18% 		3.8 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5.4 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+23% 		4.4 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		2025 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+83% 		1106 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1890 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+86% 		1017 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen4 Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM5 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		RDNA2 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 112%
Average Bench 84.1%

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Early Q3 of 2019 sees the release of the new Ryzen 5 3600X: a hex-core, 12-thread processor. AMD are releasing five new CPUs based on their latest Zen 2 microarchitecture which delivers approximately 13% better IPC than the previous 12nm Zen+. For workstation builds the 3600X is viable, however, the $200 USD Ryzen 5 3600 represents a far better value proposition. The additional $40 USD for the 3600X basically buys a better cooler (Spire vs Stealth). This allows for an extra 200 MHz of extra base and boost clock: 3.8 / 4.4 GHz on the 3600X vs 3.6 / 4.2 GHz on the 3600, this translates to approximately 2% higher overclocked performance for 20% more money. Neither of the stock coolers on the 3600 or 3600X are as effective as a $20 USD aftermarket cooler such as the Gammaxx 400. The 3600 with a Gammaxx 400 outperforms the 3600X with a Spire cooler and when both use a Gammaxx 400 they are more or less identical. The 3600X SKU is basically a marketing gimmick designed to milk unsuspecting consumers. Comparing the 3600X to Intel’s overclocked flagship i5-9600K shows that although the 3600X has 29% faster 64-core speed, it is around 11% worse for gaming (sub eight core performance). Additionally, the 3600X's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which can also impact gaming. The arrival of Zen 2 marks the end of the "Sandy Bridge (i5-2500K)" era, Intel can no longer rely exclusively on their single-core advantage to dominate the market, they must also compete on price. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
3,546
294,959
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback