COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000593WOF
AMD100-100000023BOX
▲ 824,975 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

VS
▲ 734,660 ▼

12 Cores, 24 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

Effective Speed 
+26%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 203,653 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
6,311 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 120% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 101% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 120%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
197,342 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 154th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		110 % Faster effective speed.
+26% 		87.9 %
External Data: 1080p 
+18%
20 Oct22|HardwareLUXX
The Dino Intel is not yet extinct:... 		19 % Control 30%, SpiderM 2%, CPunk 8%, RiftB 37%, TWarTroy 24%, F122 25%, DoomE 3%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best... 		23 % Forza5 8%, AoE4 32%, Bord3 38%, FarC6 27%, WatchDL 5%, BFV 41%, CPunk 4%, EldenR 22%, RDR2 0%, Civ6 19%, CSGO 77%, DoomE 0%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re... 		12 % FarC6 20%, RDR2 2%, F122 2%, MetroEx 8%, TWarW3 26%
Average Score 
+30%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		81.7 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+9% 		75 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		202 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+45% 		139 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		392 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+43% 		275 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		746 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+38% 		539 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1166 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+13% 		1030 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+29%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		91.2 Pts +4% 87.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		213 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+44% 		148 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		419 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+42% 		295 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		821 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+42% 		577 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1254 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+11% 		1128 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+51%
Market Share
Based on 67,722,208 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.33 % Hugely higher market share.
+94% 		0.17 %
Value
Value For Money 		120 % Much better value.
+50% 		79.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		82 % More popular.
+12% 		73 %
Price
Price (score) 		$208 Much cheaper.
+47% 		$395
Nice To Haves 
+17%
Age
Newest 		18 Months Much more recent.
+68% 		57 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		105 Watts 105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		6 cores 12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		12 threads 24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		5 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29% 		7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		4.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+24% 		3.8 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+15% 		4.6 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1504 Pts 2224 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+48%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1429 Pts 2036 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+42%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen4 Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM5 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		RDNA2 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 110%
Average Bench 87.9%
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
6,311
197,342
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $261Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback