AMD100-100000593WOF
AMD100-100000065BOX

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen3.
Release date: Q4 2020.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 294,590 user samples
358 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 120% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 100% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 100% Great: 120%
SPEED RANK: 17th / 1369
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
294,232 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 107% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 85% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 85% Great: 107%
SPEED RANK: 60th / 1369
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
111 % Faster effective speed.
+16%
96 %
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
14 % Forza5 3%, AoE4 19%, Bord3 18%, FarC6 27%, WatchDL 18%, BFV 14%, CPunk 1%, EldenR 7%, Civ6 28%, CSGO 32%, DoomE 0% RDR2 0%
20 Oct22|Linustechtips
We were afraid to publish this vid...
36 % Factorio 51%, Forza5 20%, Hitm3 48%, FarC6 33%, SotTR 32%, CPunk 36%, CSGO 39%, TinTW 26%, TWarW3 37%
20 Oct22|HardwareLUXX
The Dino Intel is not yet extinct:...
22 % Control 22%, CPunk 11%, RiftB 45%, TWarTroy 54%, F122 24% SpiderM 0%, DoomE 1%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81.7 Pts 84.3 Pts +3%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
208 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+28%
162 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
402 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+28%
315 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
755 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+30%
579 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1156 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+31%
885 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
90.5 Pts 94.1 Pts +4%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
214 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+24%
172 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
427 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+25%
342 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
839 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+27%
662 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1267 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+29%
983 Pts
Market Share
Based on 57,263,412 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.04 % 1.31 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,175%
Value
Value For Money
116 % Better value.
+12%
103 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
58 % 94 % Much more popular.
+62%
Price
Price (score)
$239 $213 Cheaper.
+11%
Age
Newest
2 Months Hugely more recent.
+92%
25 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
5 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+27%
3.7 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+15%
4.6 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1491 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+28%
1169 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1394 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+31%
1063 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen4 Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM5 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
RDNA2 None
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series results appearing on userbenchmark, AMD’s advanced marketing machinery declared a 20% victory over the 12900K whilst simultaneously slandering userbenchmark via hundreds of “news” outlets and thousands of supposedly disinterested twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices because AMD completely dominates “news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department permanently asleep at the wheel, If these practices continue, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Jun ’22 Steam stats) is just 2%. Meanwhile, Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for 5%. Although the new 7000 series Zen 4 CPUs are around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Intel’s 13th gen. (Raptor Lake) is scheduled to launch over the next few weeks. Smart shoppers will do well to wait until then, before considering a purchase. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire the speed of their technical progress. AMD-Raptor-4 and Intel-Zen-13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 5600X is both the entry-level and best value for money 5000 series CPU. The 5600X is a hex-core 12 thread processor with a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz boosting to 4.6 GHz. It has 35 MB of cache and a TDP rating of 65W. A cooler is included in the MSRP of $300 USD, but cheap after-market coolers (such as the $20 GAMMAXX 400) are far more effective and therefore worth the upgrade. Notably, AMD’s new Zen 3 architecture has vastly improved single-core performance and lower memory latency, which leads to a significant effective speed advantage over its predecessor, the 3600X. Last year, AMD’s class-leading marketers secured significant sales of the 3000 series CPUs despite a 15% performance deficit against lower priced Intel parts. The games, specific scenes, software/hardware settings and choice of competing hardware were often cherry picked, undisclosed and inconsistent from one product to the next. Now that AMD have actually achieved both top tier performance and market share, their marketing machinery is focused on price hikes. Users that do not wish to pay a marketing premium should investigate Intel’s 11400F, which, when paired with a 2060 Super, delivers higher EFps in four out of five of today’s most popular games, at half the price. Allocating the savings to a higher tier GPU will result in a far superior gaming PC. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) December 2022 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $410Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $167Nvidia RTX 3070 $530Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i7-12700K $320Nvidia RTX 3050 $300Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $53SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback