AMD100-100000593WOF
AMD100-100000065BOX

6 Cores, 12 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen3.
Release date: Q4 2020.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 389,731 user samples
6,311 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 120% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 101% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 120%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
383,420 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 107% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 83% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 83% Great: 107%
SPEED RANK: 114th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
110 % Faster effective speed.
+15%
95.9 %
20 Oct22|HardwareLUXX
The Dino Intel is not yet extinct:...
22 % Control 22%, CPunk 11%, RiftB 45%, TWarTroy 54%, F122 24% SpiderM 0%, DoomE 1%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
14 % Forza5 3%, AoE4 19%, Bord3 18%, FarC6 27%, WatchDL 18%, BFV 14%, CPunk 1%, EldenR 7%, Civ6 28%, CSGO 32%, DoomE 0% RDR2 0%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...
8 % FarC6 27%, F122 2%, TWarW3 11% RDR2 0%, MetroEx 2%
20 Oct22|Linustechtips
We were afraid to publish this vid...
36 % Factorio 51%, Forza5 20%, Hitm3 48%, FarC6 33%, SotTR 32%, CPunk 36%, CSGO 39%, TinTW 26%, TWarW3 37%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
81.7 Pts 84 Pts +3%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
202 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+25%
162 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
392 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+24%
315 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
746 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+29%
580 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1166 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+32%
883 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.2 Pts 93.8 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
213 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+24%
172 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
419 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+23%
342 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
821 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+23%
667 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1254 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+27%
989 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,075,246 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.3 % 1.22 % Hugely higher market share.
+307%
Value
Value For Money
121 % +0% 121 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
82 % 94 % More popular.
+15%
Price
Price (score)
$197 $120 Much cheaper.
+39%
Age
Newest
20 Months Much more recent.
+53%
43 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
5 nm Newer manufacturing.
+29%
7 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+27%
3.7 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+15%
4.6 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1504 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+30%
1160 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1429 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+35%
1055 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen4 Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM5 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
RDNA2 None
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 5600X is both the entry-level and best value for money 5000 series CPU. The 5600X is a hex-core 12 thread processor with a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz boosting to 4.6 GHz. It has 35 MB of cache and a TDP rating of 65W. A cooler is included in the MSRP of $300 USD, but cheap after-market coolers (such as the $20 GAMMAXX 400) are far more effective and therefore worth the upgrade. Notably, AMD’s new Zen 3 architecture has vastly improved single-core performance and lower memory latency, which leads to a significant effective speed advantage over its predecessor, the 3600X. Last year, AMD’s class-leading marketers secured significant sales of the 3000 series CPUs despite a 15% performance deficit against lower priced Intel parts. The games, specific scenes, software/hardware settings and choice of competing hardware were often cherry picked, undisclosed and inconsistent from one product to the next. Now that AMD have actually achieved both top tier performance and market share, their marketing machinery is focused on price hikes. Users that do not wish to pay a marketing premium should investigate Intel’s 11400F, which, when paired with a 2060 Super, delivers higher EFps in four out of five of today’s most popular games, at half the MSRP. Allocating the savings to a higher tier GPU will result in a far superior gaming PC. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback