Average Bench: 104% (63rd of 1452)

Based on 9 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00A60F11 Model: AMD Eng Sample: 100-000000593-20_Y

Within minutes of this unrealistic, pre-release, result appearing on userbenchmark, AMD’s marketing machinery declared a 20% victory over the 12900K whilst simultaneously slandering userbenchmark via hundreds of “news” outlets and thousands of supposedly disinterested twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices because AMD completely dominates “news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department permanently asleep at the wheel, If these practices continue, Ryzen may eventually end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Jun ’22 Steam stats) is just 2%. Meanwhile, Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for 5%. If Zen 4 actually delivers anywhere near a 57% real-world single core uplift, we will bow down, call AMD king, and commit seppuku! AMD’s new architecture is, once again, optimized to shine in specific benchmarks. Realistically, even if Zen 4 only catches Intel's 12th gen. (Alder Lake) in a handful of real-world scenarios, it will be a big step forward for AMD. A few weeks after Zen 4 (est. Sep 27), Intel’s 13th gen. (Raptor Lake) is scheduled to launch. Smart shoppers will do well to wait until then, before considering a purchase. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire the speed of their technical progress. AMD-Raptor-4 and Intel-Zen-13 would be better fitting product names. [Jul '22 CPUPro]

Poor: 88%Average: 104% Great: 121%
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Popular builds with this CPU

Outstanding average bench

The AMD Advanced Marketing Devices 7600X averaged 4.4% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD Advanced Marketing Devices 7600X near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Single Core Speed 187Pts
Avg. Dual Core Speed 368Pts

Above average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Advanced Marketing Devices 7600X is 33.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Advanced Marketing Devices 7600X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Memory Latency 80Pts
Avg. Multi Core Speed 1,344Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 9 samples)
Min Avg Max
68 Memory 80 92.9
160 1-Core 187 209
318 2-Core 368 409
111% 212 Pts
Min Avg Max
580 4-Core 691 804
949 8-Core 1,088 1,234
110% 889 Pts
Min Avg Max
1,238 64-Core 1,344 1,477
83.1% 1,344 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 5.4 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 92.9
1-Core 209
2-Core 409
125% 237 Pts
4-Core 804
8-Core 1,234
126% 1,019 Pts
64-Core 1,477
91% 1,477 Pts
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 89.5
1-Core 188
2-Core 374
115% 217 Pts
4-Core 709
8-Core 1,080
111% 895 Pts
64-Core 1,290
80% 1,290 Pts
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Memory 78.2
1-Core 160
2-Core 318
98% 185 Pts
4-Core 737
8-Core 1,033
111% 885 Pts
64-Core 1,343
83% 1,343 Pts
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Memory 79.4
1-Core 187
2-Core 367
110% 211 Pts
4-Core 704
8-Core 1,123
112% 914 Pts
64-Core 1,366
85% 1,366 Pts
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Memory 80.1
1-Core 190
2-Core 373
112% 214 Pts
4-Core 693
8-Core 986
105% 839 Pts
64-Core 1,368
85% 1,368 Pts
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 77.7
1-Core 195
2-Core 391
114% 221 Pts
4-Core 702
8-Core 1,076
110% 889 Pts
64-Core 1,240
77% 1,240 Pts
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 75.8
1-Core 196
2-Core 385
113% 219 Pts
4-Core 683
8-Core 1,211
114% 947 Pts
64-Core 1401
87% 1401 Pts
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Memory 78.3
1-Core 188
2-Core 355
109% 207 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 1,102
102% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,369
85% 1,369 Pts
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Memory 68
1-Core 169
2-Core 339
99% 192 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 949
93% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,238
77% 1,238 Pts

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,964,744 CPUs tested

Typical Advanced Marketing Devices 7600X Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 370%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 354%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,939

Popular Advanced Marketing Devices 7600X compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Terrible (edit your comment) Add link

1 month ago.

Comment 

AMD should stick with simple ads instead of all the manipulative bs—Aug '22

Comment 

Fake “fans”, paid reviews, and fake benchmarks: A 150 Billion dollar 60 minutes masterpiece in the making.—Aug '22


Terrible

11 months ago.

Comment 

rofl - advanced marketing devices—Jul '22

Comment 

the emperor has no clothes—Aug '22


Disliked

14 months ago.

Comment 

Simple honest ads with banners not enough for selling AMD, they need fake account network spreading lies.—Aug '22


Terrible

20 months ago.

Comment 

Glad to see consumers coming first for a change.—Jul '22


Excellent

22 months ago.

Comment 

Great review, will definitely choose this one for my next build lol.—Jul '22


Good

22 months ago.


Average

20 months ago.

Very bad memory latency as a result of the infinity fabric.


Poor

21 days ago.

choo choo

Video Amusement  www.youtube.com/...


Your
opinion?
1452 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback