Today's hottest deals
AMD100-100000651WOF
AMD100-100000591WOF
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 26,794 user samples
23,248 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 111% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 91% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 91% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 70th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
3,546 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 122% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 99% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 99% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 46th / 1463
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
104 % 112 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
Bord3 21%, BFV 1%, CPunk 1%, RDR2 8%, DoomE 0% 4 % Forza5 2%, AoE4 5%, FarC6 11%, WatchDL 4%, EldenR 1%, Civ6 22%, CSGO 39%
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench...
1 % FarC6 3%, GTAV 2%, SotTR 1%, TWarW3 4% FinFant14 6%, R6S 1%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...
MetroEx 2% 4 % FarC6 1%, RDR2 2%, F122 6%, TWarW3 12%
06 Nov22|Tom's Hardware
Intel Core i7-13700K Review: Core ...
10 % Hitm3 5%, FarC6 8%, WatchDL 9%, RDR2 9%, MSFS21 35%, F121 20% CPunk 1%, TWarW3 5%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
95.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+20%
79.8 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
158 Pts 205 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+30%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
313 Pts 404 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+29%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
606 Pts 775 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+28%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1088 Pts 1383 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+27%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
99.5 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+9%
91.3 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
166 Pts 217 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+31%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
331 Pts 434 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+31%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
656 Pts 847 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+29%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1267 Pts 1648 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+30%
Market Share
Based on 68,633,632 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.38 % Much higher market share.
+31%
0.29 %
Value
Value For Money
103 % 116 % Better value.
+12%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
64 % 70 % Slightly more popular.
+9%
Price
Price (score)
$289 $249 Cheaper.
+14%
Age
Newest
29+ Months 23 Months More recent.
+21%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1547 Pts 2025 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+31%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1432 Pts 1890 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+32%

The 5800X3D has the same core architecture as the 5800X but it runs at 11% lower base and 4% lower boost clocks. The lower clocks are in exchange for an extra 64MB of cache (96MB up from 32MB) and around 40% more money. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 5800X. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with a 3090-Ti ($2,000 USD) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, conveniently ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. Instead of focusing on real-world performance, AMD’s marketers aim to dupe consumers with bankrolled headlines. The same tactics were used with the Radeon 5000 series GPUs. Zen 4 needs to bring substantial IPC improvements for all workloads, rather than overpriced "3D" marketing gimmicks. New PC builders have little reason to look further than the $260 12600K which, at a fraction of the price, offers better all round performance in gaming, desktop and workstation applications. Users with an existing AM4 build should wait just a few more months for better performance at lower prices with Raptor Lake or even Zen 4. The marketers selling expensive “3D” upgrades today will quickly move onto Zen 4 (3D) leaving unfortunate buyers stuck on an overpriced, 6 year old, dead-end, platform. [Mar '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback