Real World Speed
Performance profile from 27,135 user samples
20,824 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 111% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 92% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 92% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 59th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
6,311 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 120% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 101% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 120%
SPEED RANK: 41st / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
104 % 110 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
Bord3 22%, BFV 1%, CPunk 1%, RDR2 8%, DoomE 1% 2 % Forza5 2%, AoE4 2%, FarC6 6%, WatchDL 1%, EldenR 1%, Civ6 5%, CSGO 37%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...
FarC6 5%, RDR2 2%, MetroEx 2% 2 % F122 9%, TWarW3 11%
20 Oct22|Linustechtips
We were afraid to publish this vid...
Factorio 5%, SotTR 7% 7 % Forza5 6%, Hitm3 6%, FarC6 3%, CPunk 9%, CSGO 38%, TinTW 6%, TWarW3 6%
06 Nov22|Tom's Hardware
Intel Core i7-13700K Review: Core ...
16 % Hitm3 14%, FarC6 12%, WatchDL 17%, RDR2 12%, MSFS21 48%, F121 21%, TWarW3 3% CPunk 1%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
95.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+17%
81.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
156 Pts 202 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+29%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
310 Pts 392 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+26%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
601 Pts 746 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+24%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1034 Pts 1166 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+13%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
99.5 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+9%
91.2 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
165 Pts 213 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+29%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
329 Pts 419 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+27%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
652 Pts 821 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+26%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1219 Pts 1254 Pts +3%
Market Share
Based on 67,774,424 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.4 % Higher market share.
+29%
0.31 %
Value
Value For Money
101 % 122 % Better value.
+21%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
63 % 82 % Much more popular.
+30%
Price
Price (score)
$309 $195 Much cheaper.
+37%
Age
Newest
24+ Months 19 Months More recent.
+21%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1524 Pts +1% 1504 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1387 Pts 1429 Pts +3%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 5800X3D has the same core architecture as the 5800X but it runs at 11% lower base and 4% lower boost clocks. The lower clocks are in exchange for an extra 64MB of cache (96MB up from 32MB) and around 40% more money. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 5800X. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with a 3090-Ti ($2,000 USD) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, conveniently ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. Instead of focusing on real-world performance, AMD’s marketers aim to dupe consumers with bankrolled headlines. The same tactics were used with the Radeon 5000 series GPUs. Zen 4 needs to bring substantial IPC improvements for all workloads, rather than overpriced "3D" marketing gimmicks. New PC builders have little reason to look further than the $260 12600K which, at a fraction of the price, offers better all round performance in gaming, desktop and workstation applications. Users with an existing AM4 build should wait just a few more months for better performance at lower prices with Raptor Lake or even Zen 4. The marketers selling expensive “3D” upgrades today will quickly move onto Zen 4 (3D) leaving unfortunate buyers stuck on an overpriced, 6 year old, dead-end, platform. [Mar '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback