Real World Speed
Performance profile from 122,387 user samples
101,563 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 117% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 100% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 100% Great: 117%
SPEED RANK: 45th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
20,824 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 111% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 92% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 92% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 59th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
109 % +5% 104 %
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
2 % Forza5 2%, AoE4 10%, FarC6 15%, WatchDL 9%, EldenR 0%, RDR2 2%, Civ6 22% Bord3 23%, BFV 2%, CPunk 1%, CSGO 4%, DoomE 0%
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench...
TWarW3 1% 10 % FarC6 16%, FinFant14 1%, GTAV 12%, SotTR 20%, CSGO 12%, R6S 12%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...
3 % F122 13%, TWarW3 12% FarC6 10%, RDR2 0%, MetroEx 1%
20 Oct22|Linustechtips
We were afraid to publish this vid...
CSGO 1% 15 % Factorio 60%, Forza5 6%, Hitm3 7%, FarC6 8%, SotTR 38%, CPunk 9%, TinTW 7%, TWarW3 1%
06 Nov22|Tom's Hardware
Intel Core i7-13700K Review: Core ...
30 % Hitm3 18%, FarC6 27%, WatchDL 24%, CPunk 14%, RDR2 35%, MSFS21 68%, F121 50%, TWarW3 6%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
80 Pts 95.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+19%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
194 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+24%
156 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
382 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+23%
310 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
736 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+22%
601 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1223 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+18%
1034 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.1 Pts 99.5 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+9%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
207 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+25%
165 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
416 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+26%
329 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
813 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+25%
652 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1367 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+12%
1219 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,748,332 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.76 % Hugely higher market share.
+85%
0.41 %
Value
Value For Money
123 % Better value.
+23%
99.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
98 % Much more popular.
+56%
63 %
Price
Price (score)
$177 Much cheaper.
+45%
$320
Age
Newest
29 Months 24+ Months More recent.
+17%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1926 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+26%
1524 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1743 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+26%
1387 Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Intel’s latest 10-core i5-12600K Alder Lake desktop processor offers an impressive 50% 64-core performance improvement over it's predecessor. The 12600K combines six hyper-threaded Golden Cove P-cores with clock speeds up to 4.9 GHz and four energy efficient Gracemont E-cores for a total of 16 threads. Alder Lake CPUs have a new LGA 1700 socket which requires new cooler brackets and a new Z690 motherboard. Z690 brings several new features including PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 memory. Most Z690 boards will ship in both DDR4 and DDR5 variants. DDR4 is likely the better option, at least until DDR5 prices settle. With an MRSP of just $290 USD, the 12600K is both cheaper and faster than the competition in both single and, notably, multi-core performance. As a result, even AMD's prolific marketing infrastructure (youtube, reddit, forums etc.) will struggle to drive sales, at least until Zen 4 launches (est. late 2022). In the meantime, Intel's i5-12600K is the obvious choice for consumers that do not wish to pay over the odds for almost unparalleled performance in the majority of workloads including gaming. That said, gamers that already own a K series CPU from the 8th gen. or higher will see limited gains in the majority of titles when paired with a 3060 (or lower) tier GPU. In some cases (e.g. PUBG or Overwatch) gamers will see fewer frame drops by disabling the E-Cores all together. If recent history is a guide, stock levels at MSRP are likely to deplete rapidly. [Nov '21 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 5800X3D has the same core architecture as the 5800X but it runs at 11% lower base and 4% lower boost clocks. The lower clocks are in exchange for an extra 64MB of cache (96MB up from 32MB) and around 40% more money. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 5800X. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with a 3090-Ti ($2,000 USD) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, conveniently ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. Instead of focusing on real-world performance, AMD’s marketers aim to dupe consumers with bankrolled headlines. The same tactics were used with the Radeon 5000 series GPUs. Zen 4 needs to bring substantial IPC improvements for all workloads, rather than overpriced "3D" marketing gimmicks. New PC builders have little reason to look further than the $260 12600K which, at a fraction of the price, offers better all round performance in gaming, desktop and workstation applications. Users with an existing AM4 build should wait just a few more months for better performance at lower prices with Raptor Lake or even Zen 4. The marketers selling expensive “3D” upgrades today will quickly move onto Zen 4 (3D) leaving unfortunate buyers stuck on an overpriced, 6 year old, dead-end, platform. [Mar '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback