Today's hottest deals
IntelBX80684I59600K
AMDYD2700BBAFBOX

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.7GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q4 2018.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.2GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
280 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+41%
198 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+15%
96 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps +2% 135 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
135 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+19%
113 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
133 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+16%
115 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 445,014 user samples
321,194 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 103% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 82% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 82% Great: 103%
SPEED RANK: 138th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
123,820 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Poor: 64% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 344th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
93.2 % Faster effective speed.
+26%
73.8 %
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
18 % Hitm2 24%, FarC5 34%, StrangeB 0%, TWarW2 26%, SotTR 28%, ACO 4%, MetroEx 19%, MESoW 15%, Divis2 9%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
16 % FarC5 40%, BFV 18%, SotTR 0%, Witcher3 6%, Civ6 17%, MetroEx 21%, Sekiro 42%, Wolf2 15% Rage2 3%, ACO 2%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
16 % FarC5 40%, BFV 18%, SotTR 0%, Witcher3 6%, Civ6 17%, MetroEx 21%, Sekiro 42%, Wolf2 15% Rage2 3%, ACO 2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
91 Pts Lower memory latency.
+20%
75.7 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
135 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+31%
103 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
268 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+33%
202 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
525 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+36%
387 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
688 Pts +3% 667 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
96.5 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+15%
83.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
153 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+30%
118 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
306 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+30%
236 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
604 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+33%
453 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
822 Pts 823 Pts +0%
Market Share
Based on 69,001,314 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.02 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,940%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
115 % Much better value.
+38%
83.2 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
91 % Much more popular.
+47%
62 %
Price
Price (score)
$130 Cheaper.
+28%
$180
Age
Newest
72 Months Slightly more recent.
+8%
78 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+32%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
6 threads 16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+167%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+16%
3.2 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+12%
4.1 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
848 Pts 1,176 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+39%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
717 Pts 1,017 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+42%
Series
CPU Architecture
Coffee Lake Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 630 None

The hex-core i5-9600K is third in Intel’s line-up of 9th generation Coffee Lake CPUs. It has a TDP of 95W and requires an aftermarket cooler (such as the $20 GAMMAXX 400). The 9600K was designed to be overclocked. Once this is enabled in the BIOS (requires a Z-series motherboard), the 9600K runs 10% faster. In terms of performance, the i5-9600K is almost unbeatable for desktop users and it has sufficient multi-core performance to handle all but the most demanding workstation tasks. For CPU encoding (Cinebench, Blender, Handbrake etc.) the Ryzen 3000 series offers great 64-core performance. For example the overclocked Ryzen 3600 is approximately 13% worse for gaming, desktop and normal consumer workloads but it is 27% faster for 64-core processing. CPU encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn, encoding tasks are far better performed by dedicated hardware such an NVENC or QuickSync. At stock clocks the i5-9600K is around 8% slower than Intel’s flagship i9-9900K but when both are overclocked, the 9600K closes the gaming gap to within two or three percent. Considering that the 9900K is the fastest gaming processor available, and almost twice the price of the 9600K, this is no small feat. The i5-9600K is aimed squarely at gamers who are not willing to compromise on performance but don't want to pay more than they need to. [Oct '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 7 2700 is an 8 core, 16 thread high-end desktop processor featuring AMD’s second generation 12nm Zen+ architecture and Precision Boost 2 technology. It is the second strongest of four new Ryzen CPUs due for imminent release. The second generation Ryzen processors, codenamed Pinnacle Ridge, are both compatible with the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Official specs for the 2700 are yet to be seen, but early benchmarks appear to indicate base and boost clock speeds of 3.2 and 4.1 GHz respectively. This translates to a modest improvement upon the previous generation 1700 which continues to offer fantastic value for money in terms of multi-core performance. The expected retail price of $299 includes a Wraith cooler and costs the same as Intel’s 6 core 12 thread i7-8700. As expected, the 8700 beats the 2700 on single and quad core intensive tasks, but lags slightly for higher core workloads. Even though the 2700 excels at pure multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames.  [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback