IntelBX80684I59600K
AMDYD270XBGAFBOX

6 Cores, 6 Threads @3.7GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q4 2018.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
280 EFps Much Better CSGO EFps.
+40%
200 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
110 EFps Better GTAV EFps.
+13%
97 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
138 EFps Slightly Better Overwatch EFps.
+7%
129 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
135 EFps Better PUBG EFps.
+17%
115 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
133 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+23%
108 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 480,271 user samples
321,194 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 103% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 82% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 82% Great: 103%
SPEED RANK: 120th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
159,077 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 61% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 298th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
93.2 % Faster effective speed.
+23%
75.7 %
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
11 % Hitm2 16%, FarC5 25%, TWarW2 15%, SotTR 22%, MetroEx 12%, MESoW 11%, Divis2 5% StrangeB 0%, ACO 2%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
7 % BFV 23%, MetroEx 16% SotTR 4%, Divis2 4%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
9 % FarC5 29%, BFV 10%, Witcher3 6%, Civ6 7%, MetroEx 14%, Sekiro 30%, Wolf2 9% SotTR 2%, Rage2 3%, ACO 5%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
9 % FarC5 29%, BFV 10%, Witcher3 6%, Civ6 7%, MetroEx 14%, Sekiro 30%, Wolf2 9% SotTR 2%, Rage2 3%, ACO 5%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
23 % OC Hitm2 15% OC, TWarW2 27% OC, F118 22% OC, GTAV 31% OC, SotTR 19% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
15 % Hitm2 9%, TWarW2 14%, F118 17%, GTAV 20%, SotTR 14%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
91 Pts Lower memory latency.
+21%
75.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
135 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+19%
113 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
268 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+22%
219 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
525 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+28%
409 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
688 Pts 708 Pts +3%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
96.5 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11%
86.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
153 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+20%
128 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
306 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+20%
254 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
604 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+21%
499 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
822 Pts 911 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+11%
Market Share
Based on 67,756,953 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.97 % Hugely higher market share.
+259%
0.27 %
Value
Value For Money
109 % Much better value.
+34%
81.7 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
92 % Much more popular.
+31%
70 %
Price
Price (score)
$155 Cheaper.
+26%
$210
Age
Newest
66 Months Slightly more recent.
+8%
72 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
6 threads 16 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+167%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 3.7 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+7%
4.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
848 Pts 1276 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+50%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
717 Pts 1096 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+53%
Series
CPU Architecture
Coffee Lake Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 630 None
ADVERTISEMENT

The hex-core i5-9600K is third in Intel’s line-up of 9th generation Coffee Lake CPUs. It has a TDP of 95W and requires an aftermarket cooler (such as the $20 GAMMAXX 400). The 9600K was designed to be overclocked. Once this is enabled in the BIOS (requires a Z-series motherboard), the 9600K runs 10% faster. In terms of performance, the i5-9600K is almost unbeatable for desktop users and it has sufficient multi-core performance to handle all but the most demanding workstation tasks. For CPU encoding (Cinebench, Blender, Handbrake etc.) the Ryzen 3000 series offers great 64-core performance. For example the overclocked Ryzen 3600 is approximately 13% worse for gaming, desktop and normal consumer workloads but it is 27% faster for 64-core processing. CPU encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn, encoding tasks are far better performed by dedicated hardware such an NVENC or QuickSync. At stock clocks the i5-9600K is around 8% slower than Intel’s flagship i9-9900K but when both are overclocked, the 9600K closes the gaming gap to within two or three percent. Considering that the 9900K is the fastest gaming processor available, and almost twice the price of the 9600K, this is no small feat. The i5-9600K is aimed squarely at gamers who are not willing to compromise on performance but don't want to pay more than they need to. [Oct '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback