Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '22 at 17:07
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	55%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$130 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 82.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 242 83% 149 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 667 68% 552 Pts	64-Core 677 42% 677 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.8% Very good	Lighting 92.7 Reflection 98.5 Parallax 92 76% 94.4 fps	MRender 87.8 Gravity 92.2 Splatting 88.5 73% 89.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$239 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 50 58 48 36 38 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.3% Average	Read 234 Write 59.3 Mixed 83.9 SusWrite 52 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 18.6 79% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 80.2 DQ Mixed 55.1 83% 166 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 21GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 102 99 103 102 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 63.7 Write 83.4 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 95.8 55% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 51% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 22GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 131 127 138 68 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 113 Write 108 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 114 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB 16,490 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	65.6% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 24.5 MC Mixed 20.7 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	211x
Core i5-8400Intel $115Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	193x
Core i7-8700Intel $140Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	133x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	65x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $36Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	33x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	26x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $66Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 124% - Outstanding

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330