Performance Results

Gaming 64%
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 55%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190717
Uptime6 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 17:07
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 55%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$135
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 242
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 667
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.8% Very good
Lighting 92.7
Reflection 98.5
Parallax 92
76% 94.4 fps
MRender 87.8
Gravity 92.2
Splatting 88.5
73% 89.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 50 58 48 36 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 234
Write 59.3
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 52
24% 107 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 18.6
79% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 80.2
DQ Mixed 55.1
83% 166 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
21GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 102 99 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 63.7
Write 83.4
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 95.8
55% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
51% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$22
22GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 131 127 138 68 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 114
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20.7
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 17.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 52%
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback