AMD100-100000589WOF
AMDYD260XBCAFBOX

12 Cores, 24 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 145,314 user samples
2,331 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 122% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 95% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 95% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 1457
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
142,983 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Poor: 64% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 330th / 1457
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
113 % Much faster effective speed.
+53%
74 %
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
5 % Hitm2 20%, SotTR 22%, ACO 12%, MetroEx 2%, Divis2 9% FarC5 3%, StrangeB 3%, TWarW2 9%, MESoW 2%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
80.7 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
76.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
210 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+88%
112 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
412 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+93%
214 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
780 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+102%
386 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1502 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+134%
643 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
90.8 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
85.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
221 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+77%
125 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
433 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+75%
247 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
857 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+79%
479 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1680 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+130%
729 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,213,813 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.14 % 0.19 % Much higher market share.
+36%
Value
Value For Money
106 % 107 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
59 % 84 % Much more popular.
+42%
Price
Price (score)
$357 $74 Much cheaper.
+79%
Age
Newest
21 Months Much more recent.
+72%
74 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
170 Watts 95 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+44%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
5 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+58%
12 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.7 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+31%
3.6 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.6 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+33%
4.2 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2990 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+216%
946 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2728 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+229%
828 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen4 Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM5 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
RDNA2 None
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 6 core, 12 thread Ryzen 5 2600X is one of four new AMD second generation of high-end desktop Ryzen processors (codenamed Pinnacle Ridge) renowned for excellent value multi-core performance. The 2600X is set to replace the also 6 core, 12 thread 1600X as AMD’s new mid-range Ryzen 5 flagship. The latest generation of CPUs features a matured Zen+ chip architecture with 12nm lithography, increased clock speeds and Precision Boost 2 technology designed to leverage more CPU power than per the first generation. The 2600X appears to have stock base / boost clock speeds of 3.6 / 4.2 GHz. This is only marginally faster than the 1600X’s 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. Modest effective speed improvements are expected, although further benchmarks are necessary to draw firm conclusions. The 2600X ships with a Wraith Spire cooler and is priced reasonably at an expected $250. However, for most use cases, the new lower clocked Ryzen 5 2600 at $200 represents better value for money. Pinnacle Ridge processors are designed to work with the new 400 series motherboards, which allow for greater overclocking head room, and they are also backwards compatible with the 300 series motherboard following a bios update. Even though the 2600X is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback