COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
AMD100-100000589WOF
AMDYD2600BBAFBOX
▲ 58767 ▼

12 Cores, 24 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

VS
▲ 777,886 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

Effective Speed 
+54%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 182,021 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
2,433 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 124% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 96% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 96% Great: 124%
SPEED RANK: 47th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
179,588 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 67% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 67% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 350th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		113 % Much faster effective speed.
+54% 		73.3 %
External Data: 1080p 
+9%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review 		9 % Hitm2 26%, FarC5 0%, SotTR 26%, ACO 15%, MetroEx 6%, Divis2 13% StrangeB 2%, TWarW2 1%, MESoW 1%
Average Score 
+87%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		81.9 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7% 		76.6 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		210 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+94% 		108 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		408 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+94% 		210 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		771 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+105% 		377 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1465 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+136% 		621 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+87%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		92.9 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+11% 		83.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		221 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+87% 		118 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		439 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+89% 		232 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		867 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+94% 		446 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1727 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+155% 		676 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+58%
Market Share
Based on 68,908,164 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.19 % 0.46 % Hugely higher market share.
+142%
Value
Value For Money 		104 % Better value.
+13% 		92.4 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		58 % 77 % Much more popular.
+33%
Price
Price (score) 		$377 $120 Much cheaper.
+68%
Nice To Haves 
+91%
Age
Newest 		25 Months Much more recent.
+68% 		78 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		170 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+62%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100% 		6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100% 		12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		5 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+58% 		12 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		4.7 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+38% 		3.4 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5.6 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+44% 		3.9 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		2988 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+236% 		889 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		2657 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+232% 		800 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Zen4 Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		AM5 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		RDNA2 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 113%
Average Bench 73.3%

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. Even though the 2600 is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
2,433
179,588
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback