AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
AMD100-100000071BOX
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
200 EFps 233 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+16%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
97 EFps 105 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+8%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
129 EFps 130 EFps +1%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
115 EFps 124 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+8%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
108 EFps 141 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+31%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,071,136 user samples
479,643 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 71% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 141st / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
591,493 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 93% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 93%
SPEED RANK: 83rd / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
81 % 86.1 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
8 % FarC5 15%, BFV 13%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 3%, Witcher3 3%, Civ6 12%, ACO 1%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 15%, Wolf2 8%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
8 % FarC5 15%, BFV 13%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 3%, Witcher3 3%, Civ6 12%, ACO 1%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 15%, Wolf2 8%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
ACO 2% 7 % FarC5 14%, BFV 13%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 0%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 12%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 15%, Wolf2 8%
06 Nov20|Gamers Nexus
Friendly Fire: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X C...
12 % SotTR 9%, GTAV 14%, RDR2 6%, TWarTKC 13%, F120 18%, TWarTKB 7%, ACO 21%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
12 % OC Hitm2 12% OC, TWarW2 12% OC, F118 15% OC, GTAV 14% OC, SotTR 7% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
14 % Hitm2 14%, TWarW2 12%, F118 14%, GTAV 16%, SotTR 12%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
9 % Hitm2 16%, FarC5 9%, StrangeB 0%, TWarW2 15%, SotTR 18%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 8%, MESoW 5%, Divis2 5%
07 Jul19|Linustechtips
I had given up on AMD… until today...
17 % SotTR 13%, BFV 14%, CSGO 43%, MetroEx 14%, R6S 2%
05 Nov20|Anandtech
AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...
14 % FarC5 20%, StrangeB 2%, Bord3 14%, GTAV 13%, Civ6 2%, FinFant15 20%, Chernob 11%, DExMD 20%, FinFant14 11%, F119 20%, RDR2 2%, GearsT 23%, WoT 23%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
14 % BFV 11%, SotTR 12%, MetroEx 20%, Divis2 12%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79 Pts +1% 78.2 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
116 Pts 134 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+16%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
228 Pts 266 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+17%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
445 Pts 503 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+13%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
805 Pts 911 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+13%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
88.2 Pts +1% 87.1 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
124 Pts 141 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+14%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
245 Pts 281 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+15%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
485 Pts 548 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+13%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
934 Pts 1013 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+8%
Market Share
Based on 44,090,286 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.14 % 2.91 % Hugely higher market share.
+155%
Value
Value For Money
82.2 % 85.9 % +5%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
71 % 89 % More popular.
+25%
Price
Price (score)
$263 Slightly cheaper.
+6%
$280
Age
Newest
38 Months 23 Months Much more recent.
+39%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+42%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz +3% 3.6 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz 4.4 GHz +2%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1350 Pts 1493 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+11%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1239 Pts 1400 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+13%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster[Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback