AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
AMD100-100000022BOX
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
200 EFps 233 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+16%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
97 EFps 101 EFps +4%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
129 EFps 131 EFps +2%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
115 EFps 119 EFps +3%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
108 EFps 131 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+21%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 705,966 user samples
461,886 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 72% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 72% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 138th / 1314
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
244,080 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 76% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 76% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 101st / 1314
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
81.2 % 84.5 % +4%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
6 % FarC5 12%, BFV 9%, SotTR 3%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 2%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 13%, Wolf2 7%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
6 % FarC5 12%, BFV 9%, SotTR 3%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 2%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 13%, Wolf2 7%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
ACO 3% 6 % FarC5 13%, BFV 9%, SotTR 3%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 3%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 13%, Wolf2 7%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
10 % OC F118 12% OC, GTAV 12% OC, SotTR 6% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
12 % Hitm2 13%, F118 11%, GTAV 14%, SotTR 11%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
StrangeB 1% 7 % Hitm2 15%, FarC5 8%, TWarW2 12%, SotTR 15%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 7%, MESoW 4%, Divis2 5%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
11 % BFV 12%, SotTR 7%, MetroEx 19%, Divis2 7%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79.1 Pts +1% 78 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
116 Pts 134 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+16%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
229 Pts 262 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+14%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
447 Pts 488 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+9%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
813 Pts 815 Pts +0%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.2 Pts +2% 85.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
125 Pts 142 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+14%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
246 Pts 281 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+14%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
486 Pts 549 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+13%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
939 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+6%
889 Pts
Market Share
Based on 43,104,966 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.19 % Higher market share.
+21%
0.98 %
Value
Value For Money
78.8 % 83.7 % Slightly better value.
+6%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
71 % +1% 70 %
Price
Price (score)
$310 $287 Slightly cheaper.
+7%
Age
Newest
36 Months 22 Months Much more recent.
+39%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 95 Watts Slightly more energy efficient.
+10%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+42%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 3.8 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz 4.4 GHz +2%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1355 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+18%
1144 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1249 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+17%
1065 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Early Q3 of 2019 sees the release of the new Ryzen 5 3600X: a hex-core, 12-thread processor. AMD are releasing five new CPUs based on their latest Zen 2 microarchitecture which delivers approximately 13% better IPC than the previous 12nm Zen+. For workstation builds the 3600X is viable, however, the $200 USD Ryzen 5 3600 represents a far better value proposition. The additional $40 USD for the 3600X basically buys a better cooler (Spire vs Stealth). This allows for an extra 200 MHz of extra base and boost clock: 3.8 / 4.4 GHz on the 3600X vs 3.6 / 4.2 GHz on the 3600, this translates to approximately 2% higher overclocked performance for 20% more money. Neither of the stock coolers on the 3600 or 3600X are as effective as a $20 USD aftermarket cooler such as the Gammaxx 400. The 3600 with a Gammaxx 400 outperforms the 3600X with a Spire cooler and when both use a Gammaxx 400 they are more or less identical. The 3600X SKU is basically a marketing gimmick designed to milk unsuspecting consumers. Comparing the 3600X to Intel’s overclocked flagship i5-9600K shows that although the 3600X has 29% faster 64-core speed, it is around 11% worse for gaming (sub eight core performance). Additionally, the 3600X's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which can also impact gaming. The arrival of Zen 2 marks the end of the "Sandy Bridge (i5-2500K)" era, Intel can no longer rely exclusively on their single-core advantage to dominate the market, they must also compete on price. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $210Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $91SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback