AMD100-100000071BOX
AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
233 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+16%
200 EFps
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
105 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+8%
97 EFps
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
130 EFps +1% 129 EFps
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
124 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+8%
115 EFps
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
141 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+31%
108 EFps
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,210,759 user samples
669,386 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 77% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Poor: 77% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 78th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
541,373 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 72% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 72% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 134th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
86.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
81.3 %
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
8 % FarC5 15%, BFV 13%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 3%, Witcher3 3%, Civ6 12%, ACO 1%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 15%, Wolf2 8%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
8 % FarC5 15%, BFV 13%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 3%, Witcher3 3%, Civ6 12%, ACO 1%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 15%, Wolf2 8%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
7 % FarC5 14%, BFV 13%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 0%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 12%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 15%, Wolf2 8% ACO 2%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
9 % Hitm2 16%, FarC5 9%, TWarW2 15%, SotTR 18%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 8%, MESoW 5%, Divis2 5% StrangeB 0%
05 Nov20|Anandtech
AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...
14 % FarC5 20%, StrangeB 2%, Bord3 14%, GTAV 13%, Civ6 2%, FinFant15 20%, Chernob 11%, DExMD 20%, FinFant14 11%, F119 20%, RDR2 2%, GearsT 23%, WoT 23%
06 Nov20|Gamers Nexus
Friendly Fire: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X C...
12 % SotTR 9%, GTAV 14%, RDR2 6%, TWarTKC 13%, F120 18%, TWarTKB 7%, ACO 21%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
12 % OC Hitm2 12% OC, TWarW2 12% OC, F118 15% OC, GTAV 14% OC, SotTR 7% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
14 % Hitm2 14%, TWarW2 12%, F118 14%, GTAV 16%, SotTR 12%
07 Jul19|Linustechtips
I had given up on AMD… until today...
17 % SotTR 13%, BFV 14%, CSGO 43%, MetroEx 14%, R6S 2%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
14 % BFV 11%, SotTR 12%, MetroEx 20%, Divis2 12%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
78.4 Pts 79 Pts +1%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
135 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+15%
117 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
268 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+17%
230 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
508 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+13%
448 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
915 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+12%
815 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.9 Pts 88.1 Pts +0%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
142 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+14%
125 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
282 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+15%
246 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
550 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+13%
485 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
1015 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+9%
933 Pts
Market Share
Based on 46,565,197 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.75 % Hugely higher market share.
+139%
1.15 %
Value
Value For Money
84.1 % Better value.
+11%
75.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
91 % Much more popular.
+30%
70 %
Price
Price (score)
$309 Cheaper.
+15%
$363
Age
Newest
26 Months Much more recent.
+37%
41 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+42%
12 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz 3.7 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.4 GHz +2% 4.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1503 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+11%
1360 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1400 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+12%
1254 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster[Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback