AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
AMD100-100000023BOX
CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
200 EFps 233 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+16%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
97 EFps 105 EFps Slightly Better GTAV EFps.
+8%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
129 EFps 130 EFps +1%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
115 EFps 124 EFps Slightly Better PUBG EFps.
+8%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
108 EFps 141 EFps Much Better Fortnite EFps.
+31%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 804,183 user samples
541,373 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.7 GHz
Worst Bench: 72% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 72% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 134th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
262,810 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 63rd / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
81.3 % 88.1 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
9 % FarC5 18%, BFV 14%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 4%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 17%, ACO 1%, MetroEx 4%, Sekiro 17%, Wolf2 7%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
9 % FarC5 18%, BFV 14%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 4%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 17%, ACO 1%, MetroEx 4%, Sekiro 17%, Wolf2 7%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
9 % Hitm2 18%, FarC5 11%, StrangeB 5%, TWarW2 14%, SotTR 17%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 7%, MESoW 4%, Divis2 7%
05 Nov20|Anandtech
AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...
GTAV 17%, Civ6 1%, RDR2 2% 9 % FarC5 20%, StrangeB 2%, Bord3 13%, Chernob 11%, DExMD 18%, FinFant14 10%, F119 21%, GearsT 30%
06 Nov20|Gamers Nexus
Friendly Fire: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X C...
19 % SotTR 13%, GTAV 19%, RDR2 6%, TWarTKC 14%, F120 28%, ACO 36%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
12 % OC Hitm2 16% OC, TWarW2 1% OC, F118 17% OC, GTAV 17% OC, SotTR 10% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
TWarW2 1% 12 % Hitm2 16%, F118 13%, GTAV 17%, SotTR 13%
07 Jul19|Linustechtips
I had given up on AMD… until today...
21 % SotTR 15%, BFV 14%, CSGO 37%, MetroEx 11%, R6S 30%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
14 % BFV 16%, SotTR 12%, MetroEx 17%, Divis2 12%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79 Pts +1% 77.9 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
117 Pts 136 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+16%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
230 Pts 270 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+17%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
448 Pts 526 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+17%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
815 Pts 1021 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+25%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
88.1 Pts 88.6 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
125 Pts 145 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+16%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
246 Pts 288 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+17%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
485 Pts 562 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+16%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
933 Pts 1098 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+18%
Market Share
Based on 46,587,570 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.15 % Higher market share.
+22%
0.94 %
Value
Value For Money
75.5 % 76.4 % +1%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % 73 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$363 Cheaper.
+22%
$466
Age
Newest
41 Months 26 Months Much more recent.
+37%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 12 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 24 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+42%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 3.8 GHz +3%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz 4.6 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+7%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1360 Pts 2266 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+67%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1254 Pts 2099 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+67%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback