Today's hottest deals
AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
AMD100-100000031BOX

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.6GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

CSGO
Dust 2 1080p Max
200 EFps 233 EFps Better CSGO EFps.
+16%
GTAV
Franklin & Lamar 1080p Max
97 EFps 101 EFps +4%
Overwatch
Temple of Anubis 1080p Max
129 EFps 131 EFps +2%
PUBG
M249 Training 1080p Max
115 EFps 119 EFps +3%
Fortnite
UserBenchmark Island 1080p Max
108 EFps 131 EFps Better Fortnite EFps.
+21%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 1,231,716 user samples
159,077 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 61% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 319th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
1,072,639 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 73% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 73% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 219th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
75.7 % 83.1 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+10%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
StrangeB 1% 6 % Hitm2 13%, FarC5 7%, TWarW2 10%, SotTR 13%, ACO 2%, MetroEx 7%, MESoW 3%, Divis2 4%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
10 % BFV 7%, SotTR 9%, MetroEx 15%, Divis2 9%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Review
ACO 0% 5 % FarC5 7%, BFV 10%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 0%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 8%, Wolf2 7%
05 Nov20|Techpowerup
AMD Ryzen 5 5800X Review
ACO 0% 5 % FarC5 7%, BFV 10%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 0%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 8%, Wolf2 7%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
ACO 2% 5 % FarC5 8%, BFV 10%, SotTR 2%, Rage2 3%, Witcher3 4%, Civ6 0%, MetroEx 6%, Sekiro 9%, Wolf2 7%
06 Nov20|Gamers Nexus
Friendly Fire: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X C...
8 % SotTR 5%, GTAV 9%, RDR2 1%, TWarTKC 9%, F120 12%, TWarTKB 5%, ACO 13%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
9 % OC TWarW2 10% OC, F118 11% OC, GTAV 10% OC, SotTR 5% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
10 % Hitm2 11%, TWarW2 10%, F118 10%, GTAV 11%, SotTR 9%
05 Nov20|Anandtech
AMD Zen 3 Ryzen Deep Dive Review: ...
Civ6 1% 11 % FarC5 16%, StrangeB 3%, Bord3 11%, GTAV 10%, FinFant15 17%, Chernob 8%, DExMD 20%, FinFant14 9%, F119 12%, RDR2 1%, GearsT 23%, WoT 21%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
75.3 Pts 76.3 Pts +1%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
113 Pts 133 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+18%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
219 Pts 259 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+18%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
409 Pts 483 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+18%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
708 Pts 792 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+12%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
86.7 Pts 87.5 Pts +1%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
128 Pts 141 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+10%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
254 Pts 281 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+11%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
499 Pts 546 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+9%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
911 Pts +5% 869 Pts
Market Share
Based on 69,048,145 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.25 % 1.12 % Hugely higher market share.
+348%
Value
Value For Money
101 % 113 % Better value.
+13%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
69 % 93 % Much more popular.
+35%
Price
Price (score)
$99 $90 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
Age
Newest
79 Months 64 Months More recent.
+19%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+42%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.7 GHz +3% 3.6 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.3 GHz +2% 4.2 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1,276 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+17%
1,091 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1,096 Pts Slightly faster 64-core speed.
+10%
999 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-threaded processor which succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 improving upon it by 13% in terms of overclocked performance. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. AMD continues to push the multi-core performance envelope: benchmarks show that the 3600 has a 27% overclocked 64-core lead over the 9600K but that the i5-9600K leads by 14% on single to hex core workloads which translates to 10% higher EFps in most of the today’s top games (e.g. PUBG, GTAV and CSGO). Additionally, the 3600's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which adversely impacts gaming. Weaknesses in memory architecture are not readily picked up by CPU benchmarks but they are apparent whilst gaming. Cheaper CPUs such as the 9400F deliver better gaming performance in nearly all of today’s popular games. At $190 USD, the 3600 offers good value for purely workstation tasks such as film production but streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The masterfully hyped Ryzen 3600 may well be the best CPU for multimedia producers on a tight budget but in today's market there are faster and less expensive alternatives for gamers, streamers and general desktop users. [Jun '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $284WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback