AMDYD1700BBAEBOX
AMD100-100000023BOX
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 448,335 user samples
205,702 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 63% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 63% Great: 80%
SPEED RANK: 311th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
242,633 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 79% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 79% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 69th / 1316
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
70.7 % 87.5 % Faster effective speed.
+24%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
23 % Hitm2 33%, FarC5 29%, StrangeB 9%, TWarW2 37%, SotTR 29%, ACO 15%, MetroEx 21%, MESoW 16%, Divis2 15%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
20 % OC Hitm2 23% OC, TWarW2 10% OC, GTAV 28% OC, SotTR 18% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
34 % Hitm2 40%, TWarW2 22%, GTAV 44%, SotTR 31%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
72 Pts 77.7 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
97.6 Pts 135 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+38%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
192 Pts 268 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+40%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
373 Pts 520 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+39%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
695 Pts 1015 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+46%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
80.2 Pts 87.9 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+10%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
112 Pts 144 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+29%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
223 Pts 287 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+29%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
443 Pts 559 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+26%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
847 Pts 1098 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+30%
Market Share
Based on 46,374,050 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.26 % 0.96 % Hugely higher market share.
+269%
Value
Value For Money
68.1 % 76.3 % Better value.
+12%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % 73 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$320 Cheaper.
+30%
$457
Age
Newest
54 Months 26 Months Much more recent.
+52%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 12 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 24 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3 GHz 3.8 GHz Faster base frequency.
+27%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 4.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+24%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1265 Pts 2271 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+80%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1061 Pts 2091 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+97%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback