AMDYD1700BBAEBOX
AMD100-100000031BOX
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 864,222 user samples
169,694 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 2.75 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 64% Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Poor: 64% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 253rd / 1276
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
694,528 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 74% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 74% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 81st / 1276
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
72.2 % 84.4 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
73.3 Pts 79 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
98.8 Pts 131 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+33%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
195 Pts 257 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+32%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
382 Pts 482 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+26%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
707 Pts 803 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+14%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
81.6 Pts 86.8 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+6%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
114 Pts 137 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+20%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
226 Pts 273 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+21%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
450 Pts 537 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+19%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
864 Pts 876 Pts +1%
Market Share
Based on 38,664,304 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.34 % 5.11 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,403%
Value
Value For Money
73.5 % 92.7 % Better value.
+26%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % 90 % More popular.
+29%
Price
Price (score)
$260 $198 Cheaper.
+24%
Age
Newest
46 Months 18 Months Much more recent.
+61%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts 65 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3 GHz 3.6 GHz Faster base frequency.
+20%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 4.2 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+14%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1277 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+13%
1132 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1080 Pts +3% 1048 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen Zen2
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-threaded processor which succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 improving upon it by 13% in terms of overclocked performance. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. AMD continues to push the multi-core performance envelope: benchmarks show that the 3600 has a 27% overclocked 64-core lead over the 9600K but that the i5-9600K leads by 14% on single to hex core workloads which translates to 10% higher EFps in most of the today’s top games (e.g. PUBG, GTAV and CSGO). Additionally, the 3600's memory controller, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency which adversely impacts gaming. Weaknesses in memory architecture are not readily picked up by CPU benchmarks but they are apparent whilst gaming. Cheaper CPUs such as the 9400F deliver better gaming performance in nearly all of today’s popular games. At $190 USD, the 3600 offers good value for purely workstation tasks such as film production but streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The masterfully hyped Ryzen 3600 may well be the best CPU for multimedia producers on a tight budget but in today's market there are faster and less expensive alternatives for gamers, streamers and general desktop users. [Jun '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) January 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback