AMD100-100000023BOX
AMDYD1700BBAEBOX

12 Cores, 24 Threads @3.8GHz, Zen2.
Release date: Q3 2019.

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.0GHz, Zen.
Release date: Q1 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 341,817 user samples
197,342 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 97% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 80% Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 80% Great: 97%
SPEED RANK: 154th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
144,475 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 422nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
87.9 % Faster effective speed.
+27%
69 %
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
23 % Hitm2 33%, FarC5 29%, StrangeB 9%, TWarW2 37%, SotTR 29%, ACO 15%, MetroEx 21%, MESoW 16%, Divis2 15%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
20 % OC Hitm2 23% OC, TWarW2 10% OC, GTAV 28% OC, SotTR 18% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
34 % Hitm2 40%, TWarW2 22%, GTAV 44%, SotTR 31%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
75 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+7%
70 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
139 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+44%
96.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
275 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+45%
190 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
539 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+47%
366 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1030 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+61%
640 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
87.9 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+12%
78.8 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
148 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+28%
116 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
295 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+27%
233 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
577 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+27%
456 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1128 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+41%
798 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,720,073 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.18 % Hugely higher market share.
+125%
0.08 %
Value
Value For Money
79.8 % +5% 76.1 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
73 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
69 %
Price
Price (score)
$395 $195 Much cheaper.
+51%
Age
Newest
57 Months Much more recent.
+33%
85 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
105 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
12 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
24 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+50%
14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.8 GHz Faster base frequency.
+27%
3 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
4.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+24%
3.7 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2224 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+89%
1178 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2036 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+108%
980 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen2 Zen
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

Early Q3 of 2019 welcomes the Ryzen 9 3900X, AMD’s current top of the range, third generation Ryzen flagship which raises the bar for 64-core processing on desktop CPUs. This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W. All this, plus a Wraith Prism cooler, at a very reasonable launch price of $499 USD. By comparison, Intel’s 8-core, 16 thread i9-9900K is available for $479 USD (and requires a cooler: $30+ USD). Benchmarks illustrate that the overclocked 3900X leads by a whopping 41% for 64-core processing but that the 9900K maintains a 10% lead for gaming, desktop and other sub octa-core tasks. The 3900 memory controller is significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations and shows a better write throughput than the lower spec 3000 models, but it still shows relatively high latency which adversely impacts gaming. In terms of 64-core performance at this price point, there is no threat from Intel. The only real competitor is the upcoming (Q4, 2019) 16-core, 32-thread 3950X ($749 USD). The Ryzen 9 3900X is compatible with the new PCIe 4.0 enabled X570 motherboard via an AM4 socket, as well as 400 and 300 series motherboards. [Jul '19 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback