AMDYD1700BBAEBOX
AMDYD2600BBAFBOX
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 832,831 user samples
181,358 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 63% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 63% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 299th / 1314
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
651,473 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 84% Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 67% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 67% Great: 84%
SPEED RANK: 196th / 1314
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
71.2 % 76.7 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+8%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
Civ6 2%, ACO 0% 5 % FarC5 12%, BFV 6%, SotTR 3%, Rage2 2%, Witcher3 1%, MetroEx 11%, Sekiro 12%, Wolf2 4%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
12 % Hitm2 10%, TWarW2 20%, GTAV 13%, SotTR 6%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
7 % Hitm2 4%, FarC5 11%, StrangeB 4%, TWarW2 10%, SotTR 5%, ACO 3%, MetroEx 9%, MESoW 11%, Divis2 4%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
72.5 Pts 78.3 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed
97.5 Pts 108 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+11%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed
192 Pts 211 Pts Slightly faster dual-core speed.
+10%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Mixed Speed
376 Pts 404 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+7%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed
696 Pts +4% 669 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
80.9 Pts 84.9 Pts +5%
1-Core
OC Single Core Mixed Speed
112 Pts 115 Pts +3%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Mixed Speed
223 Pts 229 Pts +3%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Mixed Speed
445 Pts 451 Pts +1%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Mixed Speed
857 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+14%
749 Pts
Market Share
Based on 43,102,645 CPUs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.27 % 1.85 % Hugely higher market share.
+585%
Value
Value For Money
68.5 % 85.6 % Better value.
+25%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
70 % 78 % More popular.
+11%
Price
Price (score)
$320 $186 Much cheaper.
+42%
Age
Newest
50 Months 36 Months More recent.
+28%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts 65 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3 GHz 3.4 GHz Faster base frequency.
+13%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 3.9 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+5%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed
1256 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+30%
964 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed
1062 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+21%
879 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. Even though the 2600 is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $210Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $102SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback