AMDYD1700BBAEBOX
AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 303,552 user samples
144,475 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 59% Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 59% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 422nd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
159,077 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 61% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 298th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
69 % 75.7 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+10%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
12 % Hitm2 13%, FarC5 17%, StrangeB 4%, TWarW2 20%, SotTR 10%, ACO 13%, MetroEx 13%, MESoW 12%, Divis2 8%
28 May20|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-10400F Review - Six ...
11 % FarC5 18%, BFV 14%, SotTR 5%, Rage2 1%, Witcher3 0%, Civ6 15%, ACO 6%, MetroEx 13%, Sekiro 19%, Wolf2 13%
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
8 % OC Hitm2 6% OC, TWarW2 9% OC, GTAV 9% OC, SotTR 7% OC
30 Oct19|Gamers Nexus
Intel i9-9900KS Review: Overclocki...
20 % Hitm2 20%, TWarW2 24%, GTAV 23%, SotTR 16%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
70 Pts 75.3 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
96.7 Pts 113 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+17%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
190 Pts 219 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+15%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
366 Pts 409 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+12%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
640 Pts 708 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+11%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
78.8 Pts 86.7 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+10%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
116 Pts 128 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+10%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
233 Pts 254 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+9%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
456 Pts 499 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+9%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
798 Pts 911 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+14%
Market Share
Based on 67,720,282 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.08 % 0.24 % Hugely higher market share.
+200%
Value
Value For Money
76.1 % 81.7 % Slightly better value.
+7%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
69 % 70 % +1%
Price
Price (score)
$195 Slightly cheaper.
+7%
$210
Age
Newest
85 Months 72 Months More recent.
+15%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+38%
105 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 8 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 16 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 12 nm Newer manufacturing.
+14%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3 GHz 3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+23%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.7 GHz 4.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+16%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1178 Pts 1276 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+8%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
980 Pts 1096 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+12%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None None
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is the least powerful of three new Ryzen 7 CPUs. The 1700 model has base and turbo clocks of 3.0 and 3.7 GHz respectively. Both of its more expensive siblings, the 1700X and 1800X, have higher clocks but they also have TDPs of 95 watts whereas the 1700 is rated at just 65 watts. Comparing IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake shows that Kaby Lake leads by a maximum of 9% which is great news for workstation users as this allows the 1700 to beat Intel's 6850K in multi-core workloads at almost half the price. Although the 1700 has great IPC it's somewhat limited by its relatively low (by Kaby Lake standards) clock speed which holds it back a little in both gaming and desktop workloads. For multi-core workstation use, the Ryzen 7 1700 represents the best value for money we have ever seen. [Mar '17 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback