AMDYD2600BBAFBOX
AMD100-100000589WOF

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.4GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

12 Cores, 24 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 181,919 user samples
179,588 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 67% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 67% Great: 81%
SPEED RANK: 339th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
2,331 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 122% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 95% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 95% Great: 122%
SPEED RANK: 39th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
73.3 % 113 % Much faster effective speed.
+55%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
StrangeB 2%, TWarW2 1%, MESoW 1% 9 % Hitm2 26%, FarC5 0%, SotTR 26%, ACO 15%, MetroEx 6%, Divis2 13%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
76.6 Pts 80.7 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+5%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
108 Pts 210 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+94%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
210 Pts 412 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+96%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
377 Pts 780 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+107%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
621 Pts 1502 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+142%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
83.8 Pts 90.8 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
118 Pts 221 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+87%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
232 Pts 433 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+87%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
446 Pts 857 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+92%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
676 Pts 1680 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+149%
Market Share
Based on 68,182,680 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.42 % Hugely higher market share.
+223%
0.13 %
Value
Value For Money
88.6 % 103 % Better value.
+16%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
76 % More popular.
+29%
59 %
Price
Price (score)
$140 Much cheaper.
+65%
$398
Age
Newest
74 Months 21 Months Much more recent.
+72%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+62%
170 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
6 cores 12 cores Hugely higher core count.
+100%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
12 threads 24 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+100%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
12 nm 5 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+58%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.4 GHz 4.7 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+38%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
3.9 GHz 5.6 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+44%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
889 Pts 2990 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+236%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
800 Pts 2728 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+241%
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen+ Zen4
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM4 AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
None RDNA2
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. Even though the 2600 is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback