Average Bench: 53.5% (631st of 1264)

Based on 6,839 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00630F81 Model: AMD Athlon(tm) X4 880K Quad Core Processor
Poor: 40%Average: 53.5% Great: 62%
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Average average bench

The AMD Athlon X4 880K averaged 46.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 66.6Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 69.3Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Athlon X4 880K is 22.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Athlon X4 880K performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 239Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 238Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6,839 samples)
Min Avg Max
48.6 Memory 66.6 77.1
46.8 1-Core 69.3 80.5
86 2-Core 134 155
54.2% 89.9 Pts
Min Avg Max
125 4-Core 235 284
138 8-Core 238 289
32.3% 237 Pts
Min Avg Max
136 64-Core 239 291
16% 239 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 75.8
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 153
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 274
39% 281 Pts
64-Core 282
19% 282 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 77.5
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 132
59% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 270
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 266
18% 266 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Memory 72.7
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 144
58% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 268
37% 268 Pts
64-Core 266
18% 266 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 72.9
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 138
57% 94 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 242
34% 246 Pts
64-Core 245
16% 245 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 67.3
1-Core 72
2-Core 138
56% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 259
35% 254 Pts
64-Core 261
18% 261 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 60.7
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 139
51% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 240
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 236
16% 236 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 56.9
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 124
50% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 255
34% 249 Pts
64-Core 254
17% 254 Pts
6,839 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 33,181,341 CPUs tested.

 Prices

AmazonUS $7511 months
Send price feedback
Typical Athlon X4 880K Builds (Compare 1,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $248

Popular Athlon X4 880K compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2020 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

13 months ago.

had one going on 2 years, overclocked all it's life and paired with a good cooler and graphics card it will run anything.


Terrible

4 months ago.

Too slow for simple workloads such as Gaming. Waste of money on a dead end platform


Good

11 months ago.

runs great and very cool with the new boxed cooler


Good

5 months ago.

Realy Slow Bad for Gaming Cum In my face


Your
opinion?
1264 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $300Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback