Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 14:06
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 38.3
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 118
41% 73.7 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 202
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E217) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 37.6
Parallax 45.4
29% 39.5 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 33.3
Splatting 26.1
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 189 178 193 203 206 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.5% Above average
Read 235
Write 142
Mixed 195
SusWrite 192
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 27
94% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 33.2
29% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X4G64CB88D9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 14.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 4R 8G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 22% 85 207 86 60 20.1" 1600 1200 HWP0A72 HP LP2065
Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback