Average Bench: 49.6% (770th of 1316)

Based on 6,200 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00660F01 Model: AMD Athlon(tm) X4 845 Quad Core Processor
Poor: 34%Average: 49.6% Great: 59%
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Below average average bench

The AMD Athlon X4 845 averaged 50.4% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 56.9Pts
Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 71.6Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Athlon X4 845 is 25.4%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Athlon X4 845 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 249Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 249Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6,200 samples)
Min Avg Max
34.1 Memory 56.9 71.8
47.2 1-Core 71.6 79
97.7 2-Core 138 155
52% 88.8 Pts
Min Avg Max
151 4-Core 244 286
164 8-Core 249 286
33.6% 247 Pts
Min Avg Max
156 64-Core 249 285
16.7% 249 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Server
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 70.2
1-Core 78
2-Core 146
59% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 264
37% 268 Pts
64-Core 273
18% 273 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 63.4
1-Core 78
2-Core 139
56% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 279
38% 278 Pts
64-Core 272
18% 272 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Memory 64.8
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 149
57% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 264
37% 267 Pts
64-Core 270
18% 270 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 65.7
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 147
57% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 258
35% 255 Pts
64-Core 250
17% 250 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 46.5
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 151
52% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 282
39% 285 Pts
64-Core 288
19% 288 Pts
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Memory 44.7
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 143
49% 86.8 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 261
36% 262 Pts
64-Core 270
18% 270 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Memory 42.6
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 98.5
38% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 175
25% 180 Pts
64-Core 180
12% 180 Pts
6,200 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 46,610,596 CPUs tested.

 Prices

AmazonUS $742 years
EbayUS $15115 mins
Send price feedback
Typical Athlon X4 845 Builds (Compare 2,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $103

Popular Athlon X4 845 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2021 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

21 months ago.

SO many people write this cpu off just because of it's performance, no one takes into account the fact that it's cheaper than most other cpu's on the market and that for this price point you're getting price/performance ratios similar to that of the Ryzen 5 1600


Excellent

3 months ago.

good cpu if your on a tight budget


Terrible

3 years ago.

Useless. It will make your room hotter and hotter with each minute, yet performance is completly bad. Definitely do not buy this :).


Excellent

2 years ago.

Even tho the FM2+ platform is dead, you can still make a very good entry level gaming pc since paired with an rx 560 or gtx 1050 4 gb you wont have bottleneck problems (unless you have a slow hard drive) if you have an fm2+ computer with fps problems you should buy this (it is also 50$ and most cpus at this price have 2 cores)


Good

2 years ago.

Great CPU for fun gaming & etc, just do not use a gtx 950 with it it's a bottle neck that's why i'm going to buy a new one prolly the 860k or a10 7700k


Excellent

3 years ago.

works with every game and video editors.Cheap


Excellent

3 years ago.

for the price is pretty good :)


Excellent

3 years ago.

AMAZING AND STRONG!!!! STRONGER THAN i5 6600K (only on benchmark,Intel get MANY POINTS FOR POOR GPU INSIDE,LOL) and is in SAME RANK,SAMEEEEE LIKE i7 6700K!!!!!!


Average

14 months ago.

only for bottom videocards . bottlenecking gtx 950 . i5 4570 is x2 faster minimum


Your
opinion?
1316 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback