Average Bench: 49.8% (351st of 1159)

Based on 3,806 user benchmarks.  Device: 178BFBFF00660F01 Model: AMD Athlon(tm) X4 845 Quad Core Processor
Poor: 35%Average: 49.8% Great: 56%
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Below average average bench

The AMD Athlon X4 845 averaged 50.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Quad Core Integer Speed 288Pts
Single Core Integer Speed 81Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Athlon X4 845 is 20.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD Athlon X4 845 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Multi Core Floating Point Speed 208Pts
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 256Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,806 samples)
Min Avg Max
59 SC Int 81 87.7
47.8 SC Float 66.6 71.9
54.2 SC Mixed 72.8 79.1
58.8% 73.5 Pts
Min Avg Max
184 QC Int 288 329
134 QC Float 203 230
163 QC Mixed 251 286
56.3% 247 Pts
Min Avg Max
204 MC Int 294 329
155 MC Float 208 230
172 MC Mixed 256 287
38.2% 253 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
SC Int 87.4
SC Float 71.2
SC Mixed 79
63% 79.2 Pts
QC Int 321
QC Float 227
QC Mixed 284
63% 277 Pts
MC Int 318
MC Float 224
MC Mixed 263
41% 269 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
SC Int 87.8
SC Float 71.2
SC Mixed 79.1
64% 79.4 Pts
QC Int 326
QC Float 227
QC Mixed 283
63% 279 Pts
MC Int 321
MC Float 216
MC Mixed 263
40% 267 Pts
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
SC Int 87.6
SC Float 71
SC Mixed 61.7
59% 73.4 Pts
QC Int 321
QC Float 224
QC Mixed 282
63% 276 Pts
MC Int 319
MC Float 215
MC Mixed 281
41% 272 Pts
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
SC Int 77.5
SC Float 67.5
SC Mixed 72.4
58% 72.5 Pts
QC Int 288
QC Float 208
QC Mixed 251
57% 249 Pts
MC Int 282
MC Float 208
MC Mixed 258
38% 250 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
SC Int 83.1
SC Float 67
SC Mixed 75.6
60% 75.2 Pts
QC Int 282
QC Float 206
QC Mixed 229
54% 239 Pts
MC Int 292
MC Float 214
MC Mixed 239
38% 248 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
SC Int 78.3
SC Float 68.1
SC Mixed 73.7
59% 73.4 Pts
QC Int 240
QC Float 189
QC Mixed 232
50% 220 Pts
MC Int 273
MC Float 197
MC Mixed 237
36% 236 Pts
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
SC Int 76
SC Float 66.6
SC Mixed 71.9
57% 71.5 Pts
QC Int 251
QC Float 184
QC Mixed 213
49% 216 Pts
MC Int 270
MC Float 171
MC Mixed 213
33% 218 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
SC Int 86.2
SC Float 71.3
SC Mixed 78.4
63% 78.6 Pts
QC Int 162
QC Float 113
QC Mixed 136
31% 137 Pts
MC Int 161
MC Float 111
MC Mixed 139
21% 137 Pts
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
SC Int 78.3
SC Float 62
SC Mixed 64.3
55% 68.2 Pts
QC Int 59
QC Float 51.9
QC Mixed 68.3
14% 59.7 Pts
MC Int 34.8
MC Float 36.5
MC Mixed 51.1
6% 40.8 Pts
3,806 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 17,945,857 CPUs tested.

 Prices

NeweggUS $531 month
EbayUS $6213 mins
AmazonUS $754 mins
Send price feedback
Typical Athlon X4 845 Builds (Compare 2,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $108

Popular Athlon X4 845 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical consumers. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good (edit your comment) Add link

5 days ago.

SO many people write this cpu off just because of it's performance, no one takes into account the fact that it's cheaper than most other cpu's on the market and that for this price point you're getting price/performance ratios similar to that of the Ryzen 5 1600


Good

3 months ago.

good cpu if your on a tight budget


Excellent

3 months ago.

hjhj


Terrible

11 months ago.

Useless. It will make your room hotter and hotter with each minute, yet performance is completly bad. Definitely do not buy this :).


Excellent

5 months ago.

Even tho the FM2+ platform is dead, you can still make a very good entry level gaming pc since paired with an rx 560 or gtx 1050 4 gb you wont have bottleneck problems (unless you have a slow hard drive) if you have an fm2+ computer with fps problems you should buy this (it is also 50$ and most cpus at this price have 2 cores)


Good

1 month ago.

Great CPU for fun gaming & etc, just do not use a gtx 950 with it it's a bottle neck that's why i'm going to buy a new one prolly the 860k or a10 7700k


Excellent

2 months ago.

goof


Excellent

3 months ago.

k


Excellent

11 months ago.

for the price is pretty good :)


Excellent

20 months ago.

works with every game and video editors.Cheap


Excellent

12 months ago.

AMAZING AND STRONG!!!! STRONGER THAN i5 6600K (only on benchmark,Intel get MANY POINTS FOR POOR GPU INSIDE,LOL) and is in SAME RANK,SAMEEEEE LIKE i7 6700K!!!!!!


Excellent

1 month ago.

ta un petit zizi


Your
opinion?
1159 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $145Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $275Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback