IntelBX80684I99900K
AMD100-100000589WOF

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.6GHz, Coffee Lake.
Release date: Q4 2018.

12 Cores, 24 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 357,067 user samples
354,223 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 104% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 89% Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 89% Great: 104%
SPEED RANK: 89th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
2,844 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 126% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 105% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Poor: 105% Great: 126%
SPEED RANK: 27th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
97.9 % 116 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
14 Nov19|PCGamer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review
16 % Hitm2 10%, FarC5 43%, StrangeB 2%, TWarW2 37%, SotTR 17%, ACO 5%, MetroEx 8%, MESoW 18%, Divis2 1%
10 Mar21|HardwareLUXX
Processor non grata: Rocket Lake-S...
20 % BFV 15%, SotTR 12%, MetroEx 41%, Divis2 12%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
93.1 Pts Lower memory latency.
+14%
81.5 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
142 Pts 211 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+49%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
281 Pts 411 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+46%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
551 Pts 804 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+46%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
981 Pts 1536 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+57%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
97.2 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+5%
92.2 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
153 Pts 218 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+42%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
305 Pts 434 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+42%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
604 Pts 863 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+43%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1116 Pts 1693 Pts Much faster OC octa-core speed.
+52%
Market Share
Based on 67,766,133 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.3 % Hugely higher market share.
+829%
0.14 %
Value
Value For Money
88 % 105 % Better value.
+20%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
86 % Much more popular.
+48%
58 %
Price
Price (score)
$410 $394 +4%
Age
Newest
66 Months 19 Months Much more recent.
+71%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
95 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+44%
170 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
8 cores 12 cores Much higher core count.
+50%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
16 threads 24 threads Much higher thread count.
+50%
Lithography
Manufacturing process
14 nm 5 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+64%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
3.6 GHz 4.7 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+31%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5 GHz 5.6 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+12%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
1590 Pts 2977 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+87%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
1451 Pts 2800 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+93%
Series
CPU Architecture
Coffee Lake Zen4
Socket
Motherboard Socket
FCLGA1151 AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD 630 RDNA2
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel i9-9900K is an 8 core, 16 thread, unlocked 9th generation Coffee Lake processor. It has a base / boost clocks of 3.6 / 4.7 GHz and a single-core boost of 5.0 GHz (the highest frequency achieved yet from this class of Intel CPU). It features 16 MB of cache, a 95W TDP and Intel UHD 630 graphics. The 9900K is compatible with the new Z390 chipset, and subject to a BIOS update, is also compatible with the older Z370 chipset. Aimed at users who do not wish to compromise, the i9-9900K offers the best gaming and desktop experience available at any price. Heavy workstation users should consider the Ryzen 9 3900X which is similarly priced. Comparing the overclocked 3900X shows that it is just 10% worse for gaming and desktop (sub octa-core) but around 40% better for 64-core computations. Gamers should consider the 9700K which offers identical overclocked gaming performance at a $100 USD discount. [Oct '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback