UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i7-5820K

CPU
RANKINGS

TEST
YOUR CPU

ADD TO PC
BUILD

IntelBX80648I75820K

BUY • $130

AMDYD2600BBAFBOX

BUY • $155

BenchYourCPU

Real World Speed

Performance profile from 281,282 user samples

Benchmark your CPU here

101,694 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)

Poor: 68% Great: 88%

SPEED RANK: 281^st / 1442

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

179,588 User Benchmarks

Best Bench: 81% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 67% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)

Poor: 67% Great: 81%

SPEED RANK: 331^st / 1442

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser


Effective Speed Effective CPU Speed		76.8 %	+5%		73.3 %


Memory Avg. Memory Latency	86.4 Pts	Lower memory latency. +13%	76.6 Pts
1-Core Avg. Single Core Speed	96.3 Pts		108 Pts	Faster single-core speed. +12%
2-Core Avg. Dual Core Speed	192 Pts		210 Pts	Slightly faster dual-core speed. +9%
4-Core Avg. Quad Core Speed	364 Pts		377 Pts	+4%
8-Core Avg. Octa Core Speed	594 Pts		621 Pts	+5%


Memory OC Memory Latency	94 Pts	Lower OC memory latency. +12%	83.8 Pts
1-Core OC Single Core Speed	120 Pts	+2%	118 Pts
2-Core OC Dual Core Speed	237 Pts	+2%	232 Pts
4-Core OC Quad Core Speed	462 Pts	+4%	446 Pts
8-Core OC Octa Core Speed	737 Pts	Slightly faster OC octa-core speed. +9%	676 Pts

Market Share

Based on 67,758,509 CPUs tested

See market share leaders


Market Share Market Share (trailing 30 days)	0.21 %		0.47 %	Hugely higher market share. +124%
Value Value For Money	94.7 %	Slightly better value. +10%	86.1 %
User Rating UBM User Rating	66 %		76 %	More popular. +15%
Price Price (score)	$130	Cheaper. +16%	$155


Age Newest	116 Months		72 Months	Much more recent. +38%
TDP Thermal Design Power (TDP)	140 Watts		65 Watts	Much more energy efficient. +54%
Cores CPU Processing Cores	6 cores		6 cores
Threads CPU Processing Threads	12 threads		12 threads
Lithography Manufacturing process	22 nm		12 nm	Much newer manufacturing. +45%
Base Clock Base Clock Speed	3.3 GHz		3.4 GHz	+3%
Turbo Clock Turbo Clock Speed	3.6 GHz		3.9 GHz	Slightly faster turbo frequency. +8%
64-Core OC Multi Core Speed	933 Pts	+5%	889 Pts
64-Core Avg. Multi Core Speed	748 Pts		800 Pts	Slightly faster 64-core speed. +7%


Series CPU Architecture	Haswell-E	Zen+
Socket Motherboard Socket	LGA2011-V3	AM4
Graphics Integrated Graphics	None	None

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers. ^{[Sep '14 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 5 2600, from AMD’s second generation (Zen+) of high-end desktop Ryzen processors, supersedes the first generation Ryzen 5 1600. The newer generation sees a lithography reduction from 14nm to 12nm, but no increase in the number of cores and threads (6 and 12 respectively) over the ground-breaking first generation which continues to surpass similarly priced Intel CPUs in terms of multi-core performance. In other words, progress between generations is predominantly driven by power efficiency and therefore higher attainable clock speeds. The 2600 appears to have a stock base/boost clock of 3.4 / 3.9 GHz compared to the 1600’s 3.2 / 3.6 GHz which is expected to result in a modest increase in effective speed that said, early benchmarks are inconclusive. Included in the expected retail price of about $200 is a Wraith Stealth cooler, so the 2600, like the 1600 before it, represents great value for workstation users. The 2600 compliments the new 400 series motherboards and is also backwards compatible with the 300 series following a bios update. Even though the 2600 is plausible for multimedia production streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. ^{[Apr '18 CPUPro]}

MORE DETAILS

Systems with these CPUs

Top Builds that include these CPUs

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. ^[CPUPro]

Group Test Results

Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming

Desktop

ProGaming

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

USB

How it works

- Download and run UserBenchmark
- CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
- GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
- Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
- RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
- SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
- Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
- Identify the strongest components in your PC
- See speed test results from other users
- Compare your components to the current market leaders
- Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
- Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ

AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021

How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?

What is multi core mixed speed?

What is multi core integer speed?

What is multi core floating point speed?

What is single core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core mixed CPU speed?

What is quad core floating point speed?

What is quad core integer speed?

What is single core floating point speed?

What is single core integer speed?

What is the GeekBench single core score?

What is a CPU?

What is the effective CPU speed index?

What is overclocking?

What is thermal design power (TDP)?

ALL FAQs »

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MORE DETAILS

MORE DETAILS

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

Group Test Results

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

Frequently Asked Questions

Best User Rated

Feedback