COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80648I75820K
AMDYD270XBGAFBOX
▲ 669,880 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.3GHz, Haswell-E.
Release date: Q3 2014.

VS
▲ 708,457 ▼

8 Cores, 16 Threads @3.7GHz, Zen+.
Release date: Q2 2018.

Effective Speed 
+2%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 260,771 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
101,694 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 88% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 68% Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Poor: 68% Great: 88%
SPEED RANK: 292nd / 1459
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
159,077 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 61% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 61% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 310th / 1459
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		76.8 % +2% 75.7 %
Average Score 
+10%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		86.4 Pts Lower memory latency.
+15% 		75.3 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		96.3 Pts 113 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+17%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		192 Pts 219 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+14%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		364 Pts 409 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+12%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		594 Pts 708 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+19%
Overclocked Score 
+7%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		94 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+8% 		86.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		120 Pts 128 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+7%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		237 Pts 254 Pts Slightly faster OC dual-core speed.
+7%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		462 Pts 499 Pts Slightly faster OC quad-core speed.
+8%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		737 Pts 911 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+24%
Value & Sentiment 
+15%
Market Share
Based on 68,304,349 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.15 % 0.32 % Hugely higher market share.
+113%
Value
Value For Money 		99.2 % Better value.
+18% 		84 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		66 % 70 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score) 		$110 Much cheaper.
+42% 		$190
Nice To Haves 
+32%
Age
Newest 		119 Months 75 Months Much more recent.
+37%
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		140 Watts 105 Watts More energy efficient.
+25%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		6 cores 8 cores Much higher core count.
+33%
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		12 threads 16 threads Much higher thread count.
+33%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		22 nm 12 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+45%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.3 GHz 3.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+12%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		3.6 GHz 4.3 GHz Faster turbo frequency.
+19%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		933 Pts 1276 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+37%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		748 Pts 1096 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+47%
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Haswell-E Zen+
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		LGA2011-V3 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		None None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 76.8%
Average Bench 75.7%
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel Core i7-5820K is the cheapest of three (5820K,5930K,5960X) new Haswell-E prosumer/enthusiast processors. The 5820K sports six physical cores and twelve threads which allow for enormous processing throughput. Unfortunately Intel have somewhat handicapped the 5820K by setting its base clock at just 3.3 GHz, 0.7GHz lower than the class leading 4790K. Comparing the 4790K and 5820K shows that the cheaper i7-4790K is significantly faster at both single and dual threaded workloads. The additional two cores found in the 5820K are not relevant to general computing and as such the 5820K probably makes a better server rather than consumer proposition. The Haswell-E X99 architecture also requires DDR4 RAM which is currently far more expensive than DDR3. Overall the 5820K is a very expensive option and probably best avoided by the vast majority of consumers.  [Sep '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this. The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. [Apr '18 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
101,694
159,077
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback