IntelBX80646I74770K
Intel

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q1 2013.

  

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.40 GHz, 28 W.
Release date ≈ Q2 2019.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 173,627 user samples
172,887 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 84% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 60% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.75 GHz (avg)
Poor: 60% Great: 84%
SPEED RANK: 335th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
740 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 54% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 54% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 325th / 1452
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
73.6 % 74.2 % +1%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
85.6 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+5%
81.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
101 Pts 113 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+12%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
192 Pts 218 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+14%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
334 Pts 368 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+10%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
497 Pts 505 Pts +2%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
96 Pts +4% 91.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
122 Pts 129 Pts Slightly faster OC single-core speed.
+6%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
232 Pts 257 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+11%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
403 Pts 469 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+16%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
609 Pts 644 Pts Slightly faster OC octa-core speed.
+6%
Market Share
Based on 68,075,134 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.31 % Insanely higher market share.
+3,000%
0.01 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
64 % More popular.
+28%
50 %
Age
Newest
135 Months 60+ Months Much more recent.
+56%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
620 Pts 623 Pts +0%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
513 Pts +3% 497 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q2'13 Q2'19
Cache
Cache
8 MB SmartCache 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Lithography
Lithography
22 nm 14 nm
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz 4.10 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
5 GT/s DMI2 4 GT/s
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s 37.5 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Intel® Iris® Plus Graphics 655
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
350 MHz 300 MHz
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI/VGA eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1.25 GHz 1.15 GHz
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Video Max Memory
2 GB 32 GB
Package Size
Package Size
37.5mm x 37.5mm 46x24
Turbo Boost Tech
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡
2.0 2
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) ‡
No Yes
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
Up to 3.0 3
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Core i7-4770K is Intel's fourth generation (codename Haswell) flagship processor in the hugely successful Core range. It's not surprising that the 4770K sets a new Real World Performance index record, besting its predecessor by just over 9%. The 4770K also tops out in the remainder of our benchmarks setting new highs of 10020 and 2164 in the PassMark and PassMark Single Thread tests which equates to roughly an 8% overall performance increase over the 3770K. With a TDP of 84 watts, power consumption has increased slightly over the 3770K. The new Core i7-4770K demonstrates around an 8% performance increase over its predecessor the 3770K but it costs 12% more. As a result, at least until prices drop, this processor represents marginally worse value for money than the 3770K. [Jun '13 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback