IntelBX80646I74771
Intel

4 Cores, 8 Threads @3.5GHz, Haswell.
Release date: Q2 2013.

  

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.40 GHz, 28 W.
Release date ≈ Q2 2019.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 11,920 user samples
11,180 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 82% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 60% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Poor: 60% Great: 82%
SPEED RANK: 336th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
740 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 86% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 54% Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Poor: 54% Great: 86%
SPEED RANK: 325th / 1456
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
73.5 % 74.2 % +1%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
84.2 Pts +3% 81.4 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
101 Pts 113 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+12%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
193 Pts 218 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+13%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
340 Pts 368 Pts Slightly faster quad-core speed.
+8%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
512 Pts +1% 505 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
93.9 Pts +2% 91.9 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
111 Pts 129 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+16%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
220 Pts 257 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+17%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
406 Pts 469 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+16%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
571 Pts 644 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+13%
Market Share
Based on 68,125,579 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % Slightly more popular.
+8%
50 %
Age
Newest
132 Months 60+ Months Much more recent.
+55%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
573 Pts 623 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+9%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
519 Pts +4% 497 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'13 Q2'19
Cache
Cache
8 MB SmartCache 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Instruction Set Extensions
Instruction Set Extensions
SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0 Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Lithography
Lithography
22 nm 14 nm
Max Turbo Frequency
Max Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz 4.10 GHz
Bus Speed
Bus Speed
5 GT/s DMI2 4 GT/s
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133
Memory Bandwidth
Max Memory Bandwidth
25.6 GB/s 37.5 GB/s
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 4600 Intel® Iris® Plus Graphics 655
Graphics Base Frequency
Graphics Base Frequency
350 MHz 300 MHz
Graphics Output
Graphics Output
eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI/VGA eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency
1.2 GHz 1.15 GHz
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Video Max Memory
2 GB 32 GB
Package Size
Package Size
37.5mm x 37.5mm 46x24
Turbo Boost Tech
Intel® Turbo Boost Technology ‡
2.0 2
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)
Yes No
Trusted Execution Tech
Intel® Trusted Execution Technology ‡
Yes No
PCI Express Revision
PCI Express Revision
Up to 3.0 3
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1

More specs » More specs »
ADVERTISEMENT

The Intel i7-4771 is the same as the i7-4770 apart from a 100 MHz increase in base clock from 3.4 GHz to 3.5 GHz. In theory this increase will only impact multi-core workloads because both processors have the same turbo clock of 3.9 GHz which should be engaged during single and dual core workloads. On multi-core workloads the turbo needs to be disabled in order to maintain acceptable core temperatures and operating frequencies drop to base clock where the i7-4771 has a marginal 100 MHz or 2.9% advantage. In other words the two processors should be largely identical. Looking at the i7-4770 vs the i7-4771 benchmarks verifies this. Both the 4770 and 4771 are the current top end mainstream market leaders but for the vast majority of desktop users they are probably overkill as typical consumer use rarely requires more than two cores. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback