Today's hottest deals
IntelBX8071513600K
AMD100-100000651WOF
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 50,807 user samples
27,559 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 128% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 117% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 117% Great: 128%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
23,248 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 111% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 91% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 91% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 74th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
122 % Faster effective speed.
+17%
104 %
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best...
11 % Forza5 2%, AoE4 29%, FarC6 35%, WatchDL 9%, BFV 0%, EldenR 1%, RDR2 2%, Civ6 24%, CSGO 35% Bord3 5%, CPunk 1%, DoomE 2%
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench...
3 % FarC6 2%, FinFant14 15%, GTAV 1%, CSGO 7%, R6S 0%, TWarW3 1% SotTR 5%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re...
6 % FarC6 13%, F122 11%, TWarW3 11% RDR2 2%, MetroEx 2%
20 Oct22|Linustechtips
We were afraid to publish this vid...
1 % Forza5 3%, Hitm3 8%, FarC6 9%, CPunk 10%, CSGO 27%, TinTW 3%, TWarW3 10% Factorio 47%, SotTR 17%
06 Nov22|Tom's Hardware
Intel Core i7-13700K Review: Core ...
Hitm3 3%, CPunk 6%, TWarW3 9% 9 % FarC6 3%, WatchDL 5%, RDR2 19%, MSFS21 34%, F121 27%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
83.9 Pts 95.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+14%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
213 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+35%
158 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
427 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+36%
313 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
852 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+41%
606 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1,454 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+34%
1,088 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
92.7 Pts 99.5 Pts Slightly lower OC memory latency.
+7%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
227 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+37%
166 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
454 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+37%
331 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
905 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+38%
656 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1,568 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+24%
1,267 Pts
Market Share
Based on 69,049,300 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.6 % Hugely higher market share.
+82%
0.33 %
Value
Value For Money
131 % Better value.
+30%
101 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
97 % Much more popular.
+52%
64 %
Price
Price (score)
$210 Much cheaper.
+32%
$309
Age
Newest
24 Months More recent.
+23%
31+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2,611 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+69%
1,547 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2,437 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+70%
1,432 Pts

Intel’s 13th gen. Raptor Lake CPUs offer around 10% faster gaming and 45% faster multi-core performance than their predecessors. The new CPUs are compatible with DDR4 memory and Z690/B660 ($150) motherboards. New high-end gaming builders need look no further than the 13600K. The 13600K beats AMD’s flagship 7950X in gaming and almost matches the 7900X in multi-core performance. Extreme workstation users may find value in the 13700K or 13900K. Gamers on a tight budget can save $40 USD with a 13600KF which is a 13600K without integrated graphics. Although Ryzen 7000 has weaker multi-core, weaker single-core, higher platform costs and higher unit prices AMD have a 3D joker up their sleeve (7800X3D est. 2023). Via “Advanced Marketing” on youtube, forums, reddit, and twitter AMD will demonstrate that their upcoming CPU is the “best in the world” and offer “proof” by way of a small handful of obscure workloads. Games that few people play e.g. (Factorio, SotTR) will be cherry picked, video footage of the gameplay/settings won’t be provided and frame drops will be conveniently ignored. This playbook has easily outsold Intel in recent years but with every overhyped release, consumers lose trust in AMD. Based on social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Meanwhile Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for a whopping 5.03%. Largely thanks to marketing incompetence, Intel is existentially motivated to deliver material annual performance improvements. Consumers can look forward to Meteor Lake (14th gen) in less than a years time. [Oct '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 5800X3D has the same core architecture as the 5800X but it runs at 11% lower base and 4% lower boost clocks. The lower clocks are in exchange for an extra 64MB of cache (96MB up from 32MB) and around 40% more money. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 5800X. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with a 3090-Ti ($2,000 USD) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, conveniently ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. Instead of focusing on real-world performance, AMD’s marketers aim to dupe consumers with bankrolled headlines. The same tactics were used with the Radeon 5000 series GPUs. Zen 4 needs to bring substantial IPC improvements for all workloads, rather than overpriced "3D" marketing gimmicks. New PC builders have little reason to look further than the $260 12600K which, at a fraction of the price, offers better all round performance in gaming, desktop and workstation applications. Users with an existing AM4 build should wait just a few more months for better performance at lower prices with Raptor Lake or even Zen 4. The marketers selling expensive “3D” upgrades today will quickly move onto Zen 4 (3D) leaving unfortunate buyers stuck on an overpriced, 6 year old, dead-end, platform. [Mar '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback