COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX8071513400F
AMD100-100000651WOF
▲ 922,566 ▼

10 Cores, 16 Threads @2.5GHz, Raptor Lake.
Release date: Q1 2023.

VS
Effective Speed 
+1%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 31,573 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
8,325 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 110% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 101% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 101% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 71st / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
23,248 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 111% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 91% Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 91% Great: 111%
SPEED RANK: 74th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		106 % +1% 104 %
Average Score 
+8%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		81.7 Pts 95.5 Pts Lower memory latency.
+17%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		185 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+17% 		158 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		368 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+18% 		313 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		693 Pts Faster quad-core speed.
+14% 		606 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1,162 Pts Slightly faster octa-core speed.
+7% 		1,088 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+6%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		90.1 Pts 99.5 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+10%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		192 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+16% 		166 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		384 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+16% 		331 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		747 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+14% 		656 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1,233 Pts 1,267 Pts +3%
Value & Sentiment 
+55%
Market Share
Based on 69,047,809 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.67 % Hugely higher market share.
+103% 		0.33 %
Value
Value For Money 		122 % Better value.
+24% 		99 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		92 % Much more popular.
+44% 		64 %
Price
Price (score) 		$163 Much cheaper.
+51% 		$335
Nice To Haves 
+17%
Age
Newest 		22 Months More recent.
+29% 		31+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		1,677 Pts Slightly faster OC 64-core speed.
+8% 		1,547 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		1,635 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+14% 		1,432 Pts
Conclusion 
Average Bench 106%
Average Bench 104%

The Raptor Lake Intel i5-13400F ($200 USD, cooler included) paired with a B660/B760 motherboard ($150 USD) and 2x8 GB DDR4 3600 RAM ($50 USD) offers good value for money to mid-range gamers. The 13400F has around 5% higher single-core and 35% higher multi-core performance than its predecessor. Although both processors feature the same Golden Cove p-cores, the 13400F has four additional energy efficient e-cores which account for the improvement in multi-core performance. The 13400F offers comparable gaming and better multi-core performance than AMD's 7600X but at a lower price and without the need for an aftermarket cooler, DDR5 memory and an expensive motherboard. Since Intel don’t care for long term relationships with PC hardware influencers, for product launches, they often end up sponsoring influencers that are mostly funded by AMD. As a result, Intel rarely get positive marketing coverage beyond launch, and their products remain relatively under priced compared to AMD. When paired with a DDR4 motherboard the 13100F/13400F CPUs (at MSRP) offer unbeatable/good value to entry/mid level PC gamers. High end gamers should investigate the 13600K, which thanks to both higher clocks and higher IPC (Raptor Cove), is around 15% faster than the 13400F. [Jan '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The 5800X3D has the same core architecture as the 5800X but it runs at 11% lower base and 4% lower boost clocks. The lower clocks are in exchange for an extra 64MB of cache (96MB up from 32MB) and around 40% more money. For most real-world tasks performance is comparable to the 5800X. Cache sensitive scenarios such as low res. canned game benchmarks with a 3090-Ti ($2,000 USD) benefit at the cost of everything else. Be wary of sponsored reviews with cherry picked games that showcase the wins, conveniently ignore frame drops and gloss over the losses. Also watch out for AMD’s army of Neanderthal social media accounts on reddit, forums and youtube, they will be singing their own praises as usual. Instead of focusing on real-world performance, AMD’s marketers aim to dupe consumers with bankrolled headlines. The same tactics were used with the Radeon 5000 series GPUs. Zen 4 needs to bring substantial IPC improvements for all workloads, rather than overpriced "3D" marketing gimmicks. New PC builders have little reason to look further than the $260 12600K which, at a fraction of the price, offers better all round performance in gaming, desktop and workstation applications. Users with an existing AM4 build should wait just a few more months for better performance at lower prices with Raptor Lake or even Zen 4. The marketers selling expensive “3D” upgrades today will quickly move onto Zen 4 (3D) leaving unfortunate buyers stuck on an overpriced, 6 year old, dead-end, platform. [Mar '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
8,325
23,248
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback