COMPARE
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX8071513600K
AMD100-100000061WOF
VS
Effective Speed 
+23%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 87,691 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
27,559 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 128% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 117% Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Poor: 117% Great: 128%
SPEED RANK: 15th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
60,132 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 87% Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Poor: 87% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 79th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		122 % Faster effective speed.
+23% 		99 %
External Data: 1080p 
+15%
20 Oct22|Techpowerup
Intel Core i5-13600K Review - Best... 		17 % Forza5 3%, AoE4 43%, Bord3 33%, FarC6 50%, WatchDL 17%, BFV 13%, EldenR 3%, RDR2 6%, Civ6 11%, CSGO 22% CPunk 1%, DoomE 2%
22 Nov22|Gamers Nexus
Intel i7-13700K CPU Review & Bench... 		16 % FarC6 26%, FinFant14 40%, GTAV 23%, SotTR 7%, CSGO 6%, R6S 2%, TWarW3 4%
20 Oct22|Tweakers
Intel 13th Gen Core Raptor Lake Re... 		13 % FarC6 35%, RDR2 6%, F122 13%, MetroEx 0%, TWarW3 13%
Average Score 
+26%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		83.9 Pts +3% 81.1 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		213 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+31% 		163 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		427 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+33% 		320 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		852 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+36% 		626 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1454 Pts Faster octa-core speed.
+26% 		1157 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+21%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		92.7 Pts +0% 92.3 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		227 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+27% 		179 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		454 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+28% 		356 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		905 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+30% 		694 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		1568 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+19% 		1318 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+12%
Market Share
Based on 67,751,752 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.55 % 0.58 % Slightly higher market share.
+5%
Value
Value For Money 		122 % Better value.
+20% 		102 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		103 % Much more popular.
+43% 		72 %
Price
Price (score) 		$273 $249 Slightly cheaper.
+9%
Nice To Haves 
+5%
Age
Newest 		18 Months Much more recent.
+56% 		41 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		125 Watts 105 Watts More energy efficient.
+16%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		14 cores Higher core count.
+17% 		12 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		20 threads 24 threads Higher thread count.
+20%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		10 nm 7 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+30%
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.5 GHz 3.7 GHz Slightly faster base frequency.
+6%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5.1 GHz Slightly faster turbo frequency.
+6% 		4.8 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		2611 Pts Faster OC 64-core speed.
+14% 		2290 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		2437 Pts Faster 64-core speed.
+22% 		2000 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Raptor Lake Zen3
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1700 AM4
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		UHD 770 None
Conclusion 
Average Bench 122%
Average Bench 99%
ADVERTISEMENT

Intel’s 13th gen. Raptor Lake CPUs offer around 10% faster gaming and 45% faster multi-core performance than their predecessors. The new CPUs are compatible with DDR4 memory and Z690/B660 ($150) motherboards. New high-end gaming builders need look no further than the 13600K. The 13600K beats AMD’s flagship 7950X in gaming and almost matches the 7900X in multi-core performance. Extreme workstation users may find value in the 13700K or 13900K. Gamers on a tight budget can save $40 USD with a 13600KF which is a 13600K without integrated graphics. Although Ryzen 7000 has weaker multi-core, weaker single-core, higher platform costs and higher unit prices AMD have a 3D joker up their sleeve (7800X3D est. 2023). Via “Advanced Marketing” on youtube, forums, reddit, and twitter AMD will demonstrate that their upcoming CPU is the “best in the world” and offer “proof” by way of a small handful of obscure workloads. Games that few people play e.g. (Factorio, SotTR) will be cherry picked, video footage of the gameplay/settings won’t be provided and frame drops will be conveniently ignored. This playbook has easily outsold Intel in recent years but with every overhyped release, consumers lose trust in AMD. Based on social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Meanwhile Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for a whopping 5.03%. Largely thanks to marketing incompetence, Intel is existentially motivated to deliver material annual performance improvements. Consumers can look forward to Meteor Lake (14th gen) in less than a years time. [Oct '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Ryzen 9 5900X is second in AMD’s line-up of new Zen 3 CPUs. The 12-core hyper-threaded processor has base/boost clock speeds of 3.7/4.8 GHz, a 70 MB cache and a TDP of 105W. The 5900X took center stage in the 5000 series launch presentation where AMD gunned for Intel’s “best gaming CPU” crown. They showed the 5900X as being 26% better for gaming than the previous generation’s Ryzen 9 3900XT, attributing this to the new architecture’s faster single core speeds and lower latency. AMD also stated that the 5900X achieves, on average, 6.8% faster gaming performance than Intel’s 10-core i9-10900K. The details around AMD’s testing were not disclosed but it is safe to assume that 6.8% is the highest average lead that AMD are willing to stand by. Our benchmarks show that the 5900X’s slightly faster cores and the 10900K’s slightly lower memory latency balance out to yield similar performance. Whilst presenting their figures, AMD admitted that their 3000 series CPUs were far from “best for gaming” and conceded that the 10900K is approximately 19% faster than the 3900XT (our effective speed marks the gap at just 14%). Despite this clear performance deficiency, AMD supported 3000 series sales with an aggressive and successful marketing campaign to easily outsell Intel over the last 12 months. Given the real performance uplift observed in the 5000 series, and the absence of any meaningful marketing from Intel, we expect CPU sales to shift even further in AMD’s favour. Gamers that do not wish to pay “marketing fees” should investigate Intel’s $175 USD 11400F, the $660 USD savings would be far better spent on a higher tier GPU. [Nov '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
27,559
60,132
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback