COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD
IntelBX80768265K
AMD100-100000589WOF
▲ 5019 ▼

20 Cores, 20 Threads @3.9GHz, Arrow Lake.
Release date: Q4 2024.

VS
▲ 58762 ▼

12 Cores, 24 Threads @4.7GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

Effective Speed 
+9%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 2,451 user samples
Benchmark your CPU here
18 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 132% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 110% Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 110% Great: 132%
SPEED RANK: 16th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
2,433 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 124% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 96% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Poor: 96% Great: 124%
SPEED RANK: 47th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed 		123 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9% 		113 %
Average Score 
+11%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency 		57.9 Pts 81.9 Pts Much lower memory latency.
+41%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed 		234 Pts Faster single-core speed.
+11% 		210 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed 		489 Pts Faster dual-core speed.
+20% 		408 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed 		1004 Pts Much faster quad-core speed.
+30% 		771 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed 		1989 Pts Much faster octa-core speed.
+36% 		1465 Pts
Overclocked Score 
+14%
Memory
OC Memory Latency 		75.5 Pts 92.9 Pts Lower OC memory latency.
+23%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed 		280 Pts Faster OC single-core speed.
+27% 		221 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed 		535 Pts Faster OC dual-core speed.
+22% 		439 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed 		1061 Pts Faster OC quad-core speed.
+22% 		867 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed 		2119 Pts Faster OC octa-core speed.
+23% 		1727 Pts
Value & Sentiment 
+229%
Market Share
Based on 68,889,368 CPUs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.02 % 0.2 % Hugely higher market share.
+900%
Value
Value For Money 		112 % Slightly better value.
+7% 		104 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		50 % 58 % More popular.
+16%
Price
Price (score) 		$400 $377 Slightly cheaper.
+6%
Nice To Haves 
+34%
Age
Newest 		0 Months Hugely more recent.
+100% 		25 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 		125 Watts More energy efficient.
+26% 		170 Watts
Cores
CPU Processing Cores 		20 cores Much higher core count.
+67% 		12 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads 		20 threads 24 threads Higher thread count.
+20%
Lithography
Manufacturing process 		3 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+40% 		5 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed 		3.9 GHz 4.7 GHz Faster base frequency.
+21%
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed 		5.5 GHz 5.6 GHz +2%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed 		4456 Pts Much faster OC 64-core speed.
+49% 		2988 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed 		4299 Pts Much faster 64-core speed.
+62% 		2657 Pts
Specifications 
Series
CPU Architecture 		Arrow Lake Zen4
Socket
Motherboard Socket 		FCLGA1851 AM5
Graphics
Integrated Graphics 		4Xe RDNA2
Conclusion 
Average Bench 123%
Average Bench 113%

These early benchmarks, which were probably leaked by marketers, indicate the best case scenario for Intel’s new Arrow Lake desktop processors. The new architecture appears to have notably higher memory latency than previous generations. Intel’s 12th and 13th generation CPUs continue to offer the best value for money in today’s market. [Oct '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
18
2,433
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback