Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z890-P WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z890-P WIFI  (all builds)
Memory48.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240830
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 28 '24 at 03:52
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K-$400
LGA1851, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 36.5
1-Core 179
2-Core 435
102% 217 Pts
4-Core 972
8-Core 1,972
173% 1,472 Pts
64-Core 4,381
271% 4,381 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 110%
Great: 132%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 566.03
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 197
Parallax 222
161% 206 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 198
Splatting 162
161% 203 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 149%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,775
Write 881
Mixed 1267
289% 1,308 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 77.9
254% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,309
DQ Write 1,700
DQ Mixed 1,482
1,125% 1,497 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
524GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,106
Write 1,970
Mixed 1,517
415% 1,864 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 96.8
323% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,993
DQ Write 1,463
DQ Mixed 1,676
1,266% 1,710 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6400C32 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 63.8
MC Write 58.6
MC Mixed 58.5
172% 60.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 23.7
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 150%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 27" 2560 1440 SKG3221 H32S17
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback