Average Bench: 120% (26th of 1468)

Based on 25 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF000C0662 Model: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 265K

These early benchmarks, which were probably leaked by marketers, indicate the best-case scenario for Intel’s new Arrow Lake desktop processors. The new chiplet-based design results in around 90 ns of memory latency, compared to around 60 ns on Intel’s 12th, 13th and 14th generations. Consequently, gaming performance on the 200 series (like AMD Ryzen) is susceptible to frame drops. Meanwhile, Intel’s 13600K and 14600K continue to offer almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more money on a gaming CPU is normally a waste of money as games are rarely CPU bound under real-world conditions. Without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now faces the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). [Oct '24 CPUPro]

Outstanding average bench

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K averaged 19.7% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Multi Core Speed 4,291Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 978Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is 24.7%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Memory Latency 55.6Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 221Pts

Average Bench

(Based on 25 samples)
Min Avg Max
36.5 Memory 55.6 72.7
156 1-Core 221 272
354 2-Core 467 542
122% 248 Pts
Min Avg Max
766 4-Core 978 1,074
1,544 8-Core 1,967 2,085
174% 1,473 Pts
Min Avg Max
3,217 64-Core 4,291 4,459
266% 4,291 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
LGA1851, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Memory 69.1
1-Core 270
2-Core 540
145% 293 Pts
4-Core 1,075
8-Core 2,148
190% 1,611 Pts
64-Core 4,364
270% 4,364 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Memory 71.5
1-Core 265
2-Core 529
144% 289 Pts
4-Core 1,058
8-Core 1,984
182% 1,521 Pts
64-Core 4,026
249% 4,026 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Memory 71.6
1-Core 257
2-Core 498
138% 275 Pts
4-Core 1,020
8-Core 1,928
176% 1,474 Pts
64-Core 4,523
280% 4,523 Pts
LGA1851, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Memory 62.2
1-Core 265
2-Core 530
141% 286 Pts
4-Core 1,047
8-Core 1,970
180% 1,508 Pts
64-Core 4,331
268% 4,331 Pts
25 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 69,046,522 CPUs tested

 Prices

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

MSRP ≈ $380 @ launch in Oct '24
AmazonUS $38918 mins
EbayUS $39724 mins
Send price feedback
Typical Core Ultra 7 265K Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 344%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 487%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z890 GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E34)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $1,642

Popular Core Ultra 7 265K compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

15th generation power efficient performance...

Added 26 days ago.

Disliked

25 days ago.

Comment 

Worse than 14th gen, sometimes even 13th gen. in gaming, more efficient and better productivity than last gen. —Oct '24


Good

26 days ago.


Your
opinion?
1468 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $378
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback