Intel
IntelBX8071513400F
  

4 Cores, 4 Threads @1.10 GHz, Apollo Lake.
Release date ≈ Q4 2016.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 12,240 user samples
6,637 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 36% Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 15% Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 15% Great: 36%
SPEED RANK: 1373rd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
5,603 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 102% Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 102% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 55th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
27 % 106 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+291%
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
32 Pts 83.6 Pts Hugely lower memory latency.
+161%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
35.6 Pts 186 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+422%
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
69.7 Pts 368 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+428%
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
127 Pts 682 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+437%
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
129 Pts 1141 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+784%
Memory
OC Memory Latency
46.5 Pts 90.5 Pts Hugely lower OC memory latency.
+95%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
40.6 Pts 192 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+373%
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
78.6 Pts 379 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+382%
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
156 Pts 700 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+349%
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
156 Pts 1211 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+676%
Market Share
Based on 67,766,983 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.71 % Insanely higher market share.
+7,000%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % 90 % Much more popular.
+73%
Age
Newest
88+ Months 15 Months Hugely more recent.
+83%
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
156 Pts 1658 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+963%
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
127 Pts 1609 Pts Insanely faster 64-core speed.
+1,167%
ADVERTISEMENT

If you're after low-power computing then this is a good, basic processor to get work done. Based on the 2016 14nm Apollo Lake architecture it is designed for mobile efficiency and comes in a range of laptops from budget to mid-tier. It uses about 4 to 6 watts under load (yes, four to six whole watts) and generally idles under 2 watts. It has four cores with four threads and has a 1.1GHz base clock with a 2.2GHz boost, with the included HD 500 series graphics boasting 12 execution units running at up to 700MHz, although information regarding this is limited given its budget application. If you're processing data then forget anything with this. Although possible, it'll take forever as you're limited to 256k of L1 and 2MB of L2 cache - no L3 at all. The included graphics won't help you here either. For everyday processing, or a cheap laptop for the kids, this is a decent processor but throw more than 2 or 3 basic tasks at it and it flounders. Anything more complex than everyday word processing, internet and multimedia is beyond it, but given that's what the majority of users will be doing this isn't an issue. The bonus? Ultra-light, thin and quiet latops with passive cooling and sub- $250USD price points. Not bad! [Jul '19 boingk]

MORE DETAILS

The Raptor Lake Intel i5-13400F ($200 USD, cooler included) paired with a B660/B760 motherboard ($150 USD) and 2x8 GB DDR4 3600 RAM ($50 USD) offers good value for money to mid-range gamers. The 13400F has around 5% higher single-core and 35% higher multi-core performance than its predecessor. Although both processors feature the same Golden Cove p-cores, the 13400F has four additional energy efficient e-cores which account for the improvement in multi-core performance. The 13400F offers comparable gaming and better multi-core performance than AMD's 7600X but at a lower price and without the need for an aftermarket cooler, DDR5 memory and an expensive motherboard. Since Intel don’t care for long term relationships with PC hardware influencers, for product launches, they often end up sponsoring influencers that are mostly funded by AMD. As a result, Intel rarely get positive marketing coverage beyond launch, and their products remain relatively under priced compared to AMD. When paired with a DDR4 motherboard the 13100F/13400F CPUs (at MSRP) offer unbeatable/good value to entry/mid level PC gamers. High end gamers should investigate the 13600K, which thanks to both higher clocks and higher IPC (Raptor Cove), is around 15% faster than the 13400F. [Jan '23 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback