Teclast F7S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTeclast F7S  (all builds)
MotherboardTECLAST F7S
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210324
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateOct 24 '22 at 14:07
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 78%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Memory 21.1
1-Core 21.3
2-Core 40.2
16% 27.5 Pts
4-Core 59.3
8-Core 48.3
8% 53.8 Pts
64-Core 59.1
4% 59.1 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teclast 128GB NS550-2242 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 181 157 177 178 173 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 73.8
Write 152
Mixed 145
SusWrite 171
31% 135 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 9.4
40% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 34.2
42% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 123456789012345678 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 313
13% 313 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F7S Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Teclast F7S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback