Asus X541NA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X541NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X541NA
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180227
Uptime8 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 18:32
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 77.9
33% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 155
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Asus(1043 16A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8477
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 2.5
0% 1.37 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 31 32 42 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 85.8
Write 98.9
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 40.6
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 63%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB
59GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.1 9 9.6 7.2 7.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 6.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 8.2
11% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X541NA Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X541NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback