Average Bench: 27% (1390th of 1459)

Based on 6,637 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF000506C9 Model: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3450 @ 1.10GHz
Poor: 15%Average: 27% Great: 36%
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Very poor average bench

The Intel Celeron N3450 averaged 73.0% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 32Pts
Avg. Single Core Speed 35.6Pts

Good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Celeron N3450 is 20.6%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Celeron N3450 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 127Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 129Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 6,637 samples)
Min Avg Max
14.1 Memory 32 46.5
20.2 1-Core 35.6 40.6
36.7 2-Core 69.7 78.6
26.6% 45.8 Pts
Min Avg Max
66 4-Core 127 156
72.6 8-Core 129 156
17% 128 Pts
Min Avg Max
74.6 64-Core 127 156
7.9% 127 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 42.6
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 77
32% 52.8 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 116
18% 128 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Memory 40.3
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 76
31% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 141
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Memory 38.6
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 76
30% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 130
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Memory 34.5
1-Core 34
2-Core 70.4
27% 46.3 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 127
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Memory 32.6
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 76.2
28% 49.1 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 114
18% 128 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Memory 40.7
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 57.6
27% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 77.5
8-Core 94.8
11% 86.2 Pts
64-Core 94.8
6% 94.8 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Memory 32.5
1-Core 26.5
2-Core 46.2
22% 35.1 Pts
4-Core 79.7
8-Core 79
11% 79.3 Pts
64-Core 75.4
5% 75.4 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Memory 21.5
1-Core 31.3
2-Core 45.5
19% 32.8 Pts
4-Core 77
8-Core 117
12% 96.8 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
6,637 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,250,540 CPUs tested

Typical Celeron N3450 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook x360 11 G1 EE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Celeron N3450 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Celeron® Processor N3450 (2M Cache, up to 2.2 GHz)
Code NameApollo Lake
Launch DateQ3'16
Processor NumberN3450
# of Cores4
# of Threads4
Burst Frequency2.20 GHz
Cache2 MB L2
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Recommended Price$107.00
Clock Speed1.10 GHz
Max TDP6 W
Scenario Design Power4 W

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics 500
Graphics Base Frequency200.00 MHz
Graphics Burst Frequency700.00 MHz
Graphics OutputeDP/DP/HDMI/MIPI-DSI
Wireless DisplayNo
# of Displays Supported3
Quick Sync VideoYes
InTru 3D TechNo
Clear Video HD TechYes
Clear Video Tech for MIDYes
Graphics Video Max Memory8 GB

Memory

Max Memory Size8 GB
Memory TypesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Memory Channels2
ECC Memory SupportedNo

I/O

USB Revision2.0/3.0
# of USB Ports8
General Purpose IOYes
UARTYes
Total # of SATA Ports2
Integrated LANNo
Max # of SATA 6.0 Gb/s Ports2

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision2.0
PCI Express Configurations1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2
Max # of PCI Express Lanes6

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
vPro TechNo
Identity Protection TechYes
Rapid Storage TechNo
Smart Connect TechNo
Secure BootYes
HD Audio TechYes
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)No
Small Business AdvantageNo
Smart Response TechNo
Virtualization Tech for Itanium (VT-i)No

Package

Package Size24mm x 31mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCBGA1296

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardNo
Trusted Execution TechNo
Anti-Theft TechNo

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

5 years ago.

If you're after low-power computing then this is a good, basic processor to get work done. Based on the 2016 14nm Apollo Lake architecture it is designed for mobile efficiency and comes in a range of laptops from budget to mid-tier. It uses about 4 to 6 watts under load (yes, four to six whole watts) and generally idles under 2 watts. It has four cores with four threads and has a 1.1GHz base clock with a 2.2GHz boost, with the included HD 500 series graphics boasting 12 execution units running at up to 700MHz, although information regarding this is limited given its budget application. If you're processing data then forget anything with this. Although possible, it'll take forever as you're limited to 256k of L1 and 2MB of L2 cache - no L3 at all. The included graphics won't help you here either. For everyday processing, or a cheap laptop for the kids, this is a decent processor but throw more than 2 or 3 basic tasks at it and it flounders. Anything more complex than everyday word processing, internet and multimedia is beyond it, but given that's what the majority of users will be doing this isn't an issue. The bonus? Ultra-light, thin and quiet latops with passive cooling and sub- $250USD price points. Not bad!


Your
opinion?
1459 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback