Average Bench: 23.7% (695th of 1182)

Based on 3,284 user benchmarks.  Device: BFEBFBFF000506C9 Model: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3450 @ 1.10GHz
Poor: 14%Average: 23.7% Great: 28%
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Very poor average bench

The Intel Celeron N3450 averaged 76.2% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Single Core Mixed Speed 40.5Pts
Avg. Dual Core Mixed Speed 79.5Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Celeron N3450 is just 14.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Celeron N3450 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed 148Pts
Avg. Octa Core Mixed Speed 149Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,284 samples)
Min Avg Max
23 1-Core 40.5 45.9
46.5 2-Core 79.5 87.9
28.3% 60 Pts
Min Avg Max
79.1 4-Core 148 175
85.4 8-Core 149 176
20.2% 148 Pts
Min Avg Max
89.7 64-Core 148 176
9.9% 148 Pts
User Benchmarks Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 87.9
32% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 169
24% 172 Pts
64-Core 176
12% 176 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 86.3
31% 65.9 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 174
12% 174 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 85.6
31% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 164
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 86.3
30% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 166
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 170
11% 170 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 86.8
31% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 171
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 176
12% 176 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
1-Core 44.2
2-Core 87
31% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 168
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 171
12% 171 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 84.1
30% 63.3 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 156
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 159
11% 159 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
1-Core 29.7
2-Core 56.5
20% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 79.9
8-Core 72.5
11% 76.2 Pts
64-Core 81.2
5% 81.2 Pts
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
1-Core 19.6
2-Core 32.7
13% 26.2 Pts
4-Core 61.6
8-Core 84.3
10% 72.9 Pts
64-Core 22.6
2% 22.6 Pts
3,284 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 20,370,181 CPUs tested.

Typical Celeron N3450 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Jumper EZbook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Popular Celeron N3450 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2019 CPU Rankings.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical gamers and desktop users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating which is geared towards gamers. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Celeron® Processor N3450 (2M Cache, up to 2.2 GHz)
Code NameApollo Lake
Launch DateQ3'16
Processor NumberN3450
# of Cores4
# of Threads4
Burst Frequency2.20 GHz
Cache2 MB L2
Instruction Set64-bit
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Recommended Price$107.00
Clock Speed1.10 GHz
Max TDP6 W
Scenario Design Power4 W

Graphics

Processor GraphicsIntel® HD Graphics 500
Graphics Base Frequency200.00 MHz
Graphics Burst Frequency700.00 MHz
Graphics OutputeDP/DP/HDMI/MIPI-DSI
Wireless DisplayNo
# of Displays Supported3
Quick Sync VideoYes
InTru 3D TechNo
Clear Video HD TechYes
Clear Video Tech for MIDYes
Graphics Video Max Memory8 GB

Memory

Max Memory Size8 GB
Memory TypesDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Memory Channels2
ECC Memory SupportedNo

I/O

USB Revision2.0/3.0
# of USB Ports8
General Purpose IOYes
UARTYes
Total # of SATA Ports2
Integrated LANNo
Max # of SATA 6.0 Gb/s Ports2

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision2.0
PCI Express Configurations1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2
Max # of PCI Express Lanes6

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost TechNo
Hyper-Threading TechNo
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
vPro TechNo
Identity Protection TechYes
Rapid Storage TechNo
Smart Connect TechNo
Secure BootYes
HD Audio TechYes
Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP)No
Small Business AdvantageNo
Smart Response TechNo
Virtualization Tech for Itanium (VT-i)No

Package

Package Size24mm x 31mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCBGA1296

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardNo
Trusted Execution TechNo
Anti-Theft TechNo

 Comments

Added n/a ago.

Good

2 months ago.

If you're after low-power computing then this is a good, basic processor to get work done. Based on the 2016 14nm Apollo Lake architecture it is designed for mobile efficiency and comes in a range of laptops from budget to mid-tier. It uses about 4 to 6 watts under load (yes, four to six whole watts) and generally idles under 2 watts. It has four cores with four threads and has a 1.1GHz base clock with a 2.2GHz boost, with the included HD 500 series graphics boasting 12 execution units running at up to 700MHz, although information regarding this is limited given its budget application. If you're processing data then forget anything with this. Although possible, it'll take forever as you're limited to 256k of L1 and 2MB of L2 cache - no L3 at all. The included graphics won't help you here either. For everyday processing, or a cheap laptop for the kids, this is a decent processor but throw more than 2 or 3 basic tasks at it and it flounders. Anything more complex than everyday word processing, internet and multimedia is beyond it, but given that's what the majority of users will be doing this isn't an issue. The bonus? Ultra-light, thin and quiet latops with passive cooling and sub- $250USD price points. Not bad!


Your
opinion?
1182 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $346Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback