Today's hottest deals
Intel
Intel
  

4 Cores, 4 Threads @1.10 GHz, Apollo Lake.
Release date ≈ Q4 2016.

  

4 Cores, 4 Threads @1.44 GHz, Cherry Trail.
Release date ≈ Q2 2016.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 15,693 user samples
6,637 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 36% Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 15% Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Poor: 15% Great: 36%
SPEED RANK: 1399th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
9,056 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 28% Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 9% Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Poor: 9% Great: 28%
SPEED RANK: 1442nd / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
27 % Faster effective speed.
+26%
21.4 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
32 Pts 33.9 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+6%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
35.6 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+133%
15.3 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
69.7 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+134%
29.8 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
127 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+142%
52.5 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
129 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+137%
54.5 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
46.5 Pts 47.7 Pts +3%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
40.6 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+127%
17.9 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
78.6 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+126%
34.8 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
156 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+149%
62.6 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
156 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+149%
62.6 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,964,513 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % +2% 51 %
Age
Newest
94+ Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
100+ Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
156 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+149%
62.7 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
127 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+134%
54.2 Pts
Launch Date
Launch Date
Q3'16 Q1'16
Burst Frequency
Burst Frequency
2.20 GHz 1.92 GHz
Cache
Cache
2 MB L2 2 MB
Recommended Price
Recommended Customer Price
$107.00 $21.00
Scenario Design Power
Scenario Design Power (SDP)
4 W 2 W
Max Memory Size
Max Memory Size (dependent on memory type)
8 GB 2 GB
Memory Types
Memory Types
DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s DDR3L-RS 1600
Memory Channels
Max # of Memory Channels
2 1
Processor Graphics
Processor Graphics ‡
Intel® HD Graphics 500 Intel® HD Graphics 400
Graphics Burst Frequency
Graphics Burst Frequency
700.00 MHz 500.00 MHz
Wireless Display
Intel® Wireless Display
No Yes
# of Displays Supported
# of Displays Supported ‡
3 2
Graphics Video Max Memory
Graphics Video Max Memory
8 GB 2 GB
USB Revision
USB Revision
2.0/3.0 3.0
Package Size
Package Size
24mm x 31mm 17mm x 17mm
PCI Express Configurations
PCI Express Configurations ‡
1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 1x1
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
Max # of PCI Express Lanes
6 1

More specs » More specs »

If you're after low-power computing then this is a good, basic processor to get work done. Based on the 2016 14nm Apollo Lake architecture it is designed for mobile efficiency and comes in a range of laptops from budget to mid-tier. It uses about 4 to 6 watts under load (yes, four to six whole watts) and generally idles under 2 watts. It has four cores with four threads and has a 1.1GHz base clock with a 2.2GHz boost, with the included HD 500 series graphics boasting 12 execution units running at up to 700MHz, although information regarding this is limited given its budget application. If you're processing data then forget anything with this. Although possible, it'll take forever as you're limited to 256k of L1 and 2MB of L2 cache - no L3 at all. The included graphics won't help you here either. For everyday processing, or a cheap laptop for the kids, this is a decent processor but throw more than 2 or 3 basic tasks at it and it flounders. Anything more complex than everyday word processing, internet and multimedia is beyond it, but given that's what the majority of users will be doing this isn't an issue. The bonus? Ultra-light, thin and quiet latops with passive cooling and sub- $250USD price points. Not bad! [Jul '19 boingk]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback