AMD100-100000514WOF
IntelBX8070110400F

16 Cores, 32 Threads @4.5GHz, Zen4.
Release date: Q3 2022.

6 Cores, 12 Threads @2.9GHz, Comet Lake.
Release date: Q2 2020.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 156,169 user samples
3,143 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 124% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 95% Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 95% Great: 124%
SPEED RANK: 33rd / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
153,026 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 75% Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Poor: 75% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 177th / 1442
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
114 % Much faster effective speed.
+33%
85.2 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
79.3 Pts 89.6 Pts Lower memory latency.
+13%
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
209 Pts Much faster single-core speed.
+77%
118 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
408 Pts Much faster dual-core speed.
+77%
230 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
791 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+82%
435 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1527 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+114%
715 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
91.4 Pts 95.9 Pts +5%
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
221 Pts Much faster OC single-core speed.
+78%
124 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
436 Pts Much faster OC dual-core speed.
+77%
246 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
857 Pts Much faster OC quad-core speed.
+77%
485 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1685 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+117%
778 Pts
Market Share
Based on 67,772,670 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.11 % 1.49 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,255%
Value
Value For Money
94.2 % 113 % Better value.
+20%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
61 % 88 % Much more popular.
+44%
Price
Price (score)
$549 $98 Hugely cheaper.
+82%
Age
Newest
19 Months Much more recent.
+60%
47 Months
TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
170 Watts 65 Watts Much more energy efficient.
+62%
Cores
CPU Processing Cores
16 cores Hugely higher core count.
+167%
6 cores
Threads
CPU Processing Threads
32 threads Hugely higher thread count.
+167%
12 threads
Lithography
Manufacturing process
5 nm Much newer manufacturing.
+64%
14 nm
Base Clock
Base Clock Speed
4.5 GHz Much faster base frequency.
+55%
2.9 GHz
Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed
5.7 GHz Much faster turbo frequency.
+33%
4.3 GHz
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
3877 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+296%
978 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
3670 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+306%
903 Pts
Series
CPU Architecture
Zen4 Comet Lake
Socket
Motherboard Socket
AM5 FCLGA1200
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
RDNA2 None
ADVERTISEMENT

Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. It’s difficult for consumers to make rational choices while AMD completely dominates “sponsored news” and social media channels. Ten years ago, when AMD was the underdog, this type of marketing was understandable. Today, with a capitalization of $150 Billion USD, it’s disrespectful to AMD's own users. Even with Intel's marketing department asleep at the wheel, Ryzen will quickly end up in the same state as Radeon. Following a series of overhyped releases, consumers have little interest in the Radeon brand. The combined market share for all of AMD’s (discrete) Radeon RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs (Steam stats) is just 2%. Although the new 7000 series Zen4 CPUs are actually around 15% faster than their predecessors, they have hefty cooling requirements (TDP +60% vs 5000 series), 30 second BIOS post times, expensive DDR5 RAM requirements and only work with expensive motherboards. Despite the 7000 series struggling to match Intel’s outgoing 12th gen, AMD market it as a “future proof” platform! They want users to pay a premium for last gen performance in exchange for the shallow promise of upgrades in the future. Over the next few days, Intel’s 13th gen (Raptor Lake) will launch. Shoppers will do well to wait until then. Despite AMD’s Neanderthal marketing techniques, it’s hard not to admire their technical progress. AMD-Raptor4 and Intel-Zen13 would be better fitting product names. [Sep '22 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The i5-10400F is a six-core hyperthreaded CPU from Intel’s latest Comet Lake series of desktop processors. This 65 W CPU has single core and all core boost frequencies of 4.3 GHz and 4.0 GHz, respectively. Whilst the 10400F will require a new LGA1200 motherboard, such as the Z490, Intel have guaranteed that the next generation of Rocket Lake CPUs will also be compatible with this chipset. The 10400F is aimed at mid-tier gaming PC builds, and as such, ships with a cooler but without integrated graphics. Despite being officially launched in Q2 of 2020, at the time of writing, the 10400F is still not widely available. Compared to the similarly priced Ryzen 5 3600, the 10400F’s lower memory latency gives it the lead in gaming and effective speed benchmarks. Since the Ryzen architecture creates a gaming bottleneck, it is necessary to upgrade to a higher tier, Intel CPU for better gaming performance. On the other hand comparing the i5-10400F and the i3-10100 shows that the 10100 offers comparable gaming performance for 22% less money whilst also including integrated graphics. [Jun '20 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) April 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback