Today's hottest deals
AMD100-000001084
IntelBX80601920

8 Cores, 16 Threads.
Release date ≈ Q4 2024.

4 Cores, 8 Threads @2.66GHz, Nehalem.
Release date: Q3 2008.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 69,126 user samples
52 User Benchmarks
Great bench: 132% Base clock 5.65 GHz, turbo 5.65 GHz (avg)
Poor bench: 112% Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Poor: 112% Great: 132%
SPEED RANK: 18th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
69,074 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 72% Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Worst Bench: 46% Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Poor: 46% Great: 72%
SPEED RANK: 580th / 1468
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
Effective Speed
Effective CPU Speed
122 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+99%
61.6 %
Memory
Avg. Memory Latency
92.1 Pts Slightly lower memory latency.
+8%
84.9 Pts
1-Core
Avg. Single Core Speed
220 Pts Hugely faster single-core speed.
+240%
64.7 Pts
2-Core
Avg. Dual Core Speed
432 Pts Hugely faster dual-core speed.
+248%
124 Pts
4-Core
Avg. Quad Core Speed
816 Pts Hugely faster quad-core speed.
+287%
211 Pts
8-Core
Avg. Octa Core Speed
1,499 Pts Hugely faster octa-core speed.
+403%
298 Pts
Memory
OC Memory Latency
98.9 Pts +4% 94.7 Pts
1-Core
OC Single Core Speed
230 Pts Hugely faster OC single-core speed.
+171%
84.8 Pts
2-Core
OC Dual Core Speed
460 Pts Hugely faster OC dual-core speed.
+186%
161 Pts
4-Core
OC Quad Core Speed
912 Pts Hugely faster OC quad-core speed.
+227%
279 Pts
8-Core
OC Octa Core Speed
1,782 Pts Hugely faster OC octa-core speed.
+359%
388 Pts
Market Share
Based on 68,990,290 CPUs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
2.5 % Insanely higher market share.
+4,900%
0.05 %
Value
Value For Money
111 % Much better value.
+32%
83.9 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
56 % +4% 54 %
Price
Price (score)
$399 $90 Much cheaper.
+77%
Age
Newest
0+ Months Hugely more recent.
+100%
194 Months
64-Core
OC Multi Core Speed
2,402 Pts Hugely faster OC 64-core speed.
+502%
399 Pts
64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Speed
2,266 Pts Hugely faster 64-core speed.
+641%
306 Pts

AMD’s 7800X3D and 9800X3D CPUs, priced over $400 USD, are widely marketed as “the best gaming CPUs in the world”. This is demonstrated at low resolutions with a 4090-class GPU, whilst conveniently ignoring 0.1% lows (frame drops). Under cherry-picked cache-bound conditions the X3D chips can excel, but there’s a trade-off: the additional cache results in 6% lower boost clocks and 50% to 80% higher prices than their regular counterparts (9700X and 7700X.) As with their Radeon GPUs, AMD is looking to drive demand through advanced marketing rather than delivering real-world performance. While Nvidia has effectively countered AMD’s marketing in the GPU space, Intel's marketers remain asleep (terminally?) at the wheel. Nevertheless, the 13600K and 14600K still deliver almost unparalleled real-world gaming performance for around $200 USD. Spending more on a gaming CPU is often pointless, as games are limited by the GPU in real-world scenarios. Without significant improvements in social media marketing: forums, reddit, youtube etc., Intel now face the very real risk of bankruptcy (third worst-performing S&P500 stock from Jan to Aug 2024). Since this summary was published just two days ago, hundreds of twitter threads, thousands of “pcmasterrace” reddit posts, multiple magazine articles, and several youtube videos have emerged in unanimous support for the $480 USD 9800X3D. All of these supposedly disinterested actors are working the weekend to convince you to pay their favourite billion-dollar brand an extra $280 USD this holiday season. [Nov '24 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

The Intel Core i7-920 is five and a half years old which puts it at an enormous disadvantage to more modern processors. The 920 sports four cores and eight threads which is the same basic configuration that Intel still uses in the majority of their i7s. Comparing the 920 to the 4770K, its modern day equivalent, shows that 920 lags by 63% at stock speeds and by 44% when both processors are overclocked. Overclocking improves the 920 by 30% vs just 17% for the 4770K. Aside from approximately 50% more calculation throughput the 4770K offers lower power consumption, compatibility with Intel's latest FCLGA1150 platform, on-board graphics and newer CPU instructions. Owners of the 920 should probably consider upgrading not only to improve system response times but also to take advantage of the newer platform. [Mar '14 CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback